I have to respectfully disagree with the comment about suits. The Golden Era proved that a man in a suit could look fun. Well, narrow that down to the late 30's-early 50's. In some social circles, a suit is seen as a form of pretension, and I'll never understand that. They're stylish, elegant...
I've pretty much always been against this look, since the cravat does so much to the outfit. The suit without a tie look just ends up looking sloppy and very vanilla. It's not like a tie takes that much extra time to incorporate into the fit anyway, anyone could do the four-in-hand knot in their...
The first one is what I'm aspiring to for my future black tie ensemble. Thank you for the inspiration! Can you send a picture of just the waistcoat alone?
Beautiful tie! I'm trying to branch out from late 40's swing ties and into 20's and 30's territory, but there's so little of what I'm looking for in this period. Great cravat you have there, though!
I don't have a big belly, so this wouldn't even be a problem. As for fitting in-- It could be said that every aspect of the habiliments illustrated in these ads are out of place today, most certainly in casual zones, where I wear outfits like in the ads. I get complimented on the shirts, shoes...
I'm watching this on ebay and have actually sent a question about it. A wonderful suit, just far out of my budget. Shame, it would be perfect for me. Whoever gets this one is a lucky one!
On eBay I see a lot of trousers that have a rise of 12''. This is obviously a change up from modern pants I've worn with a rise of 9'', but I'm curious as to what measurement will be required to have results such as these.
Perhaps 12'' is enough?
Indeed. It makes me wish there were more hat receipts from long ago, or stamped dates somewhere. I like utilizing clues on my garments to imagine the history behind it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.