Field Leathers

[red devil]

I am less critical of the collabs. Basically, sought-after brands offer easy-to-get slots for standardized products.

It´s a bit like Thurston-Bros.: Yes, you can get a stock Vanson, but you can´t specc. the details.

That´s why the Carl-collab doesn´t sit well with me. I am with @Marc mndt: why do a collab and then offer customization?
That must be a slap in the face of clients queueing for a year or so.

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't Thrston Bros a distributor? At least they are the ons who distribute Thedi in the US?

And then you have some makers that do OEM work for better known brands, that is another concept.

But just tacking on the name of a random reviewer?

 

[Tom71]

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't Thrston Bros a distributor? At least they are the ons who distribute Thedi in the US?

And then you have some makers that do OEM work for better known brands, that is another concept.

But just tacking on the name of a random reviewer?

Yes, you are right. Maybe I took a misleading example.

I was commenting from a consumer perspective: How can I get a product fast when I would need to wait for months or even years for a MTO product.

I chose TB as an example since they sell standard OTR jackets and thought this was comparable to small makers doing collabs.

 

[red devil]

Yes, you are right. Maybe I took a misleading example.

I was commenting from a consumer perspective: How can I get a product fast when I would need to wait for months or even years for a MTO product.

I chose TB as an example since they sell standard OTR jackets and thought this was comparable to small makers doing collabs.

Agreed, offering a group buy is a good way for small makers to optimise their production ressources, and for buyers to get an item without the hassle of speccing it - quite a few clients just want a shoe or a jacket without delving into details after all.

 

[Zoro]

From my ignorance in the process of making a leather jacket (or a jacket, no matter the material), I could understand prioritizing a collab when you stick to set sizes (collaboration or not). Even if you end up having to put them all together separately and that takes the same effort as a fully custom one, you would be able to have the different pieces cut at once for several jackets of the same size. This could allow for time efficiency and more sales in less times.

This said, now he's moving onto made to measure for this new collaboration, I would be trembling if I was currently waiting on an order. I considered ordering his B3 (it may not be very appreciated here, but I find it gorgeous ) and I know that if I had done it, I would be having second thoughts right now due to this and asking what's up as the new collab looks like "new people skipping the queue".

It's still entirely possible he could be ahead of all the prior orders and fully estimate he'll still deliver within the promised timeframe, but, even if this is the case, it would still feel wrong to bring a new project in between them.

It could also be possible he's estimating (or hoping) this collab will push his business enough to allow him to add someone to the team, which would increase his business and/or decrease his lead times on standing and newer orders.

I don't know, possibilities are endless. Still, there should be open communication with anyone who's still waiting and seeing him offer a product with a far lower lead time than theirs.

 

[El Marro]

It´s a bit like Thurston-Bros.: Yes, you can get a stock Vanson, but you can´t specc. the details.

That’s not actually true. You can order custom Vanson, Aero, and Thedi through Thurston brothers and you can absolutely spec. the details you want.

 

[Tom71]

That’s not actually true. You can order custom Vanson, Aero, and Thedi through Thurston brothers and you can absolutely spec. the details you want.

Ok, I will now fully and unconditionally offer surrender.

I was hinting at the option of quick gratification by taking stock offerings vs. accepting long (at times unplannable) wait times for going custom.
I still think that an attractive collaboration product can scratch the “want” itch without taking away the benefit of bespoke details for the waiting customers.

I accept that my TB example is flawed as they have their own production slot system in place and offer intermediary services of some kind.
Admittedly, as was only thinking about their stock sections.

 

[X83]

I am less critical of the collabs. Basically, sought-after brands offer easy-to-get slots for standardized products.

It´s a bit like Thurston-Bros.: Yes, you can get a stock Vanson, but you can´t specc. the details.

That´s why the Carl-collab doesn´t sit well with me. I am with @Marc mndt: why do a collab and then offer customization?
That must be a slap in the face of clients queueing for a year or so.

I have here my only rough out jacket its funny because I saw Gregs post for the original rough out in brown and did want to purchase it but I always like some form of custom fit and say so for most of my jackets for two reasons one being I want it to be different and second well price wise what we pay for these jackets we should have some say so this is just my opinion in anywise this is a full rough out from Johnson I have posted before its beefy for sure but you can wear no prob out the box I also have a suede jacket but its from brooks brothers and is much more of a fashion jacket im all for a beefy suede jacket as for now I can speak to full rough out being able to take some punishment for sure