Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Field Leathers Dallas – The First Prototype

Derick_leather

New in Town
Messages
41
IMG_9524.jpeg
IMG_9525.jpeg
I recently received this Field Leathers Dallas, and I thought I would share some details about the jacket and its development.


Field Leathers is a small leather-jacket maker based in Scotland and run by Greg Field. Greg began making jackets at Aero Leather in 2012 before developing his own patterns and designs. His work is strongly influenced by vintage jackets, but rather than simply reproducing original patterns, he refines classic details to create a more wearable modern fit. Most of the cutting and construction is done by Greg himself in his workshop.


Greg confirmed that this jacket is the very first Dallas prototype, as well as the first Field Leathers jacket made from Badalassi Carlo Nemesi leather.


His intention with the Dallas was to create an easy-to-wear 1940s-style jacket. The basic front design came from a jacket he had made several years earlier, although he felt that its collar and lapels were a little too aggressive. For the Dallas, he softened those lines to make the overall design more balanced and wearable.


One of its most distinctive features is the decorative D-pocket-style stitch line across the front. Greg first saw this detail on a vintage Seattle Woolen jacket owned by Jake, better known as @almostvintagestyle. He felt that the stitching would add some classic character while visually connecting the different elements of the jacket.


The Dallas is therefore not a direct reproduction of one particular vintage model. It combines the front design of one of Greg’s earlier jackets, the general character of a 1940s sports jacket, and the decorative stitching inspired by the vintage Seattle Woolen jacket.


After the prototype was completed, Greg and his pattern makers reviewed it before developing the final pattern. In Greg’s words, “all of the changes were minimal.”


The major finished measurements—including the chest, midsection, hem, shoulders, sleeves and back length—were all marked as good. The revisions mainly involved small refinements to the inside sleeve seam, cuff length, collar length and curve, back gusset, half-belt width and the allowance around the front zipper.


Although this is the first prototype, its overall silhouette and design are therefore very close to the final Dallas pattern.


The leather is Badalassi Carlo Nemesi, sometimes written as “Nemesis” by English-language leather suppliers. It is a full-grain, vegetable-tanned cowhide with a dense surface, irregular grain and a great deal of natural character.


The leather is easily the most striking aspect of the jacket in person. Its grain and colour change considerably depending on the lighting, and the large folds that develop around the sleeves and body give it a very distinctive appearance. It already has plenty of texture, but I expect the areas around the cuffs, pockets and lapels to develop even more shine and depth with wear.

623363D8-0915-4698-B202-27FE034FBB95.jpeg
DSC06555.jpeg
DSC06543.jpeg

The fit is close and slim, but the jacket remains very comfortable. The back gussets and well-developed pattern provide good mobility, even with the front zipped. It has the sharp appearance of a tight-fitting jacket without feeling overly restrictive, which suits Greg’s original idea of an easy-to-wear 1940s-style jacket.


Being the first Dallas prototype and the first Field Leathers jacket made from Nemesi makes it particularly interesting to me. More importantly, Greg was generous enough to explain the inspiration behind the design and the process of refining the pattern, which makes the jacket feel even more special.


Finished Measurements


Measured flat and recorded by Greg


  • Chest: 22.75 in / 57.8 cm
  • Midsection: 21.25 in / 54.0 cm
  • Hem: 21 in / 53.3 cm
  • Shoulders: 18.8 in / 47.8 cm
  • Sleeves: 25.5 in / 64.8 cm
  • Back length: 23.75 in / 60.3 cm
  • Back width: 18 in / 45.7 cm

More photos and updates on Instagram:
@derrick_leather
https://www.instagram.com/derrick_leather/
 

AeroFan_07

I'll Lock Up
Messages
7,209
Location
Iowa
Interesting review & jacket. However, does anyone else feel the D-pocket iterations have gotten a little redundant? I do like that a hand-warmer pocket is integrated here, but the shape & relative design of this specific D-pocket really does not do anything for me personally. This is my personal opinion. It just seems that the D-pocket concept has sort of been beat to death, and it's time to move on to more original designs, etc?
 

Tom71

I'll Lock Up
Messages
4,057
Location
Europe
Good Review, and a very nice jacket. The leather looks interesting. Can you compare to other Badalassi offerings (I find them thick and spongy with a very luxurious feel, but perhaps a bit too much for everyday use).

The design strongly reminds me of Himel’s Ni****ing Rider.

How do you feel about the main zipper? I am always irritated by No. 5 zips on thick leather (YKK’s “Universal” seems to work in the long run, the vintage Talons or Hookless don’t).

Thanks again. Something else for sure!
 

Derick_leather

New in Town
Messages
41
Good Review, and a very nice jacket. The leather looks interesting. Can you compare to other Badalassi offerings (I find them thick and spongy with a very luxurious feel, but perhaps a bit too much for everyday use).

The design strongly reminds me of Himel’s Ni****ing Rider.

How do you feel about the main zipper? I am always irritated by No. 5 zips on thick leather (YKK’s “Universal” seems to work in the long run, the vintage Talons or Hookless don’t).

Thanks again. Something else for sure!
As for the main zipper, it appears to be a vintage-style Talon No. 5. It has worked smoothly so far, but I agree that it feels a little small for a leather jacket like this. The original pull tab was also slightly awkward to grip, so I added my own zipper pull, as you can see in the photo. That has made it much easier to use. I have only owned the jacket for a short time, though, so I cannot yet comment on its long-term durability.
 

Derick_leather

New in Town
Messages
41
Interesting review & jacket. However, does anyone else feel the D-pocket iterations have gotten a little redundant? I do like that a hand-warmer pocket is integrated here, but the shape & relative design of this specific D-pocket really does not do anything for me personally. This is my personal opinion. It just seems that the D-pocket concept has sort of been beat to death, and it's time to move on to more original designs, etc?
I understand your point, and I do agree that D-pocket designs have become a little overused lately. At the same time, most leather jackets are ultimately reinterpretations of vintage archetypes. For something genuinely new to emerge, someone would probably have to create a new masterpiece that becomes an archetype in its own right. Until then, I suppose the difference lies in how well those familiar elements are reworked and combined.
 

CriscoPisco

New in Town
Messages
10
Location
San Jose
Interesting review & jacket. However, does anyone else feel the D-pocket iterations have gotten a little redundant? I do like that a hand-warmer pocket is integrated here, but the shape & relative design of this specific D-pocket really does not do anything for me personally. This is my personal opinion. It just seems that the D-pocket concept has sort of been beat to death, and it's time to move on to more original designs,
I agree. The fit looks too tight to move in as well. From what I’ve seen Field leathers designs and patterns look great laid flat and like straight jackets when worn.
 

Derick_leather

New in Town
Messages
41
I agree. The fit looks too tight to move in as well. From what I’ve seen Field leathers designs and patterns look great laid flat and like straight jackets when worn.
I agree that D-pocket designs have become a bit repetitive. But judging comfort and mobility from a photo seems like quite a leap. It doesn’t feel restrictive at all. Personally, I don’t wear leather jackets oversized. If I wanted baggy fit, I’d choose a fabric jacket instead.
 

CriscoPisco

New in Town
Messages
10
Location
San Jose
I agree that D-pocket designs have become a bit repetitive. But judging comfort and mobility from a photo seems like quite a leap. It doesn’t feel restrictive at all. Personally, I don’t wear leather jackets oversized. If I wanted baggy fit, I’d choose a fabric jacket instead.
I understand and forgive me for using your photos but the shoulders of the jacket and the armhole seem to be creating a great deal of tension across the front of the jacket. Only you can know if this is true or not as the photos are dark. But to my eye this looks like the same pattern issues I’ve seen from FL in the past with super narrow shoulders and chest.
IMG_1116.jpeg
IMG_1117.jpeg
 

Biff42

One Too Many
Messages
1,225
It's a really nice jacket, congrats. FWIW, I love Badalassi leathers. They're so luxurious and if I'm being honest, I love the squeak.
 

Derick_leather

New in Town
Messages
41
I understand and forgive me for using your photos but the shoulders of the jacket and the armhole seem to be creating a great deal of tension across the front of the jacket. Only you can know if this is true or not as the photos are dark. But to my eye this looks like the same pattern issues I’ve seen from FL in the past with super narrow shoulders and chest.
View attachment 801869 View attachment 801870
I agree that Greg Field tends to cut his armholes relatively deep and generous, but I don’t consider that a flaw in the pattern. There is plenty of room through the armholes, and the action pleats in the back provide good mobility, so the jacket does not feel restrictive at all when worn.


I also think the tension you pointed out in the previous photo was largely exaggerated by the camera angle and my posture. When the jacket is photographed more directly from the front, without that angle, it does not appear particularly narrow through the shoulders or chest.


I do prefer a close fit, so I agree that the jacket is not roomy. However, I personally don’t see it as having the serious pattern issue you described.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9692.jpeg
    IMG_9692.jpeg
    102.2 KB · Views: 75
  • IMG_9693.jpeg
    IMG_9693.jpeg
    176.2 KB · Views: 72

Biff42

One Too Many
Messages
1,225
I agree that Greg Field tends to cut his armholes relatively deep and generous, but I don’t consider that a flaw in the pattern. There is plenty of room through the armholes, and the action pleats in the back provide good mobility, so the jacket does not feel restrictive at all when worn.


I also think the tension you pointed out in the previous photo was largely exaggerated by the camera angle and my posture. When the jacket is photographed more directly from the front, without that angle, it does not appear particularly narrow through the shoulders or chest.


I do prefer a close fit, so I agree that the jacket is not roomy. However, I personally don’t see it as having the serious pattern issue you described.

If it works for you and you like it, then don't worry about it.People argue about fit around here like it's politics or religion.

On a side note, does Fields really have a 4 year wait list?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
115,485
Messages
3,194,813
Members
59,132
Latest member
FionaBassl
Top