Judgmentalist
A-List Customer
- Messages
- 392
That was written by ChatGPT, for example. It also massively stinks sometimes. It will misunderstand things, make connections that aren’t there, make assumptions that aren’t supported, and a bunch of other major screw ups. What I mostly think it is good at is as a data aggregator. It can read a lot faster than I can. A human has to be involved in parsing the data, and AI absolutely stinks at telling fantasy from reality.People use AI for all kinds of stuff, but in this context,
I use ChatGPT—basically you paste text in and it can clean it up, shorten it, or reword it. It doesn’t really care if the grammar’s rough or there’s slang—it just figures out what you meant and smooths it out.
Microsoft has the same idea built right into their products now with Microsoft Copilot. In Word, Outlook, Teams, etc., you can highlight text, hit a button, and it’ll rewrite it for you. So realistically, anyone on a PC can do this—copy, paste, “make this sound better,” done.
Where it falls apart a bit:
So the way most people use it well is as a draft tool, not a final product. Clean it up, then rewrite it so it actually sounds like you.
- It has a recognizable tone if you just take the first draft. Kind of polished but generic.
- It can miss nuance—especially sarcasm, humor, or when you’re trying to sound like yourself instead of “professional.”
- It’ll sometimes be confident and wrong, especially if you’re asking it for facts instead of just rewriting something.
- It doesn’t really “know” anything—it’s just predicting what sounds right, so you still have to use judgment.


