Edward
Bartender
- Messages
- 25,082
- Location
- London, UK
I wondered that too.
Don't know what the Damned play like now, neither RnR or P#nk, you can't be 'Rebel Teens' when you look like you are 50 something.
They still play all the old stuff - very credibly, too. They're much more skilled now, inevitably (playing together for forty plus years will do that to you), but they still have it.
Funny thing remembering the Teds V P#nk days, I always caught the last train from Southend to Basildon on a Saturday night and got home just in time to watch So it Goes and all the bands. I was reminiscing about those days when I bought a book about the Pistols in a used book shop to which the owner was quite stunned when I fondly remembered:-
Me "Looking back though, some P#unk bands just sounded crap even though they could really play"
(store owner looking all misty eyed and smiling)
The me again "And funnily enough, I still think they are crap now".
Him "So why buy the book?"
Me "Nostalgia mate"
Days from a time lost in time.
Heh. Very true.
How popular was P#nk Rock? Well there has never been a successful revival like the Mods or Teds had. The Ted look was partly smart drape suits with leather jackets for everyday and the Mods still had something similar with their mohair suits. But the P#unks? One of my school mates used to go out in his dads old striped pajama's and a bike jacket in the 70s with Vaseline spiking his hair up. I don't think the P#nk look transfers to an older generation very well.
Oh and Edward, thanks for the info on Nellie the Elephant Got to look that up on YouTube now.
J
Enjoy! In terms of punk's popularity, it was never mainstream. It was enormously musically influential, but not in that direct way like the Beatles or such, where it goes mainstream then gets revived by a nostalgia market. It's more like the rockers than the mods: it's never needed revivived because it has always carried on in its own little pockets, keepin' it real, rather than being a fashion movement.
While I no longer listen to bands like GBH or Chron Gen, other bands of that era hold up well IMO. Some bands like the Buzzcocks might seem more New Wave than punk now, but back then we didn't distinguish between the two very much. I still love listening to them, the Jam, the Clash, Stiff Little Fingers, Richard He'll and a few more.
One of the great things about punk rock was and remains just how varied it was, from the Clash's later dub / reggae stuff, to Blondie, to the Ramones, to the Pistols.... much less boxed in than, say, the metal scene of the eighties. Also a much morep rogressive space for women as performers than any other comparable movement.
Regarding punk fashion, I liked that there weren't strong rules about what was ok, at least in the first few years. Look at the Clash's performance on "Friday's" TV show. Joe's got a tough punk look going, and Mick is wearing a purple zoot suit!
In that respect it only starting going wrong when the pressgot hold of it and tried to do the "how to be a punk" uniform nonsense....or, more to the point, when some folks started buying into that.
I don't know about comparisons with the UK and US Punk fashions were but yes, here anything went. Granddads stripy pyjamas with Doc Martens(for the fight with the Teds later), bin liners, ripped tights or stockings for the girls, bondage trousers and just about anything to shock so you didn't have to be a Nazi to wear a Swastika.
The US movement was much less overtly political than the UK scene, though that changed markedly into the eighties, particularly on the West Coast with the likes of the Dead Kennedys. Fashion wise, it was much the same, albeit that the UK scene had a somewhat more theatrical look that blended in later to goth and New Romantic in a way that didn't quite happen in the US, as I understand it.
The use of the swastika and other Nazi symbology was much misunderstood by idiots who thought that punk rock was pro-Nazi (notably, Johnny Rotten always wore his Nazi bits inverted, as a deliberate sign of disrespect for those, as much as they also made a fashion statement aimed at the restrictiveness of British society at the time).
Teds would get wound up about John Lydon wearing a drape with safety pins, but to be honest he looked a lot better than some of them and leather bike jackets were pretty well covered across the board, though no one favoured Lewis despite what folks say these days.
Not many of them could bladdy afford Lewis! Though a few wore old, second hand ones, like Sid; Steve Jones probably half-inched his. The Clash boys, like the Damned, got into Lewis after they hit the big time and could afford it. Of course, back then the British motorcylce industry was still alive, and there were a heck of a lot of leather producers at all levels (Mascot were an affordable alternative to Lewis, for one- worn by the Damned, and even Ferghal Sharkey of the Undertones, though he still remains more commonly associated with the N3B.)
You still see old Teds and Rockers, a few fat Mods on scooters but not many Punks spitting and pogoing the night away. Personally I just don't think it is a good look on an older person, a 57 year old man in a swastika T shirt with DESTROY on it looks a bit......... Well you can't be a rebellious teenager forever can you.
I don't know.... most old punks follow in the wake of the likes of Dave Vanian and go 30s, or goth, but in my honest opinion there's no better a rebellion sometimes than sticking up two fingers to the unhealthy fetishisation of the cult of youth that has come to dominate everything in recent years. It's one of the reasons the Pistols had to come back. Mind you, John Lydon himself wears a lot of tweed these days....