Bluechel
One Too Many
- Messages
- 1,013
Day-um.....
-
The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Vintage Cal - It's changing my outlook on things
- Thread starter TooManyHatsOnlyOneHead
- Start date
Featured products
-
John Lofgren Monkey Boots Shinki Horsebuttt - $1,136 The classic monkey boot silhouette in an incredibly rich Shinki russet horse leather. -
Grant Stone Diesel Boot Dark Olive Chromexcel - $395 Goodyear welted, Horween Chromexcel, classic good looks. -
Schott 568 Vandals Jacket - $1,250 The classic Perfecto motorcycle jacket, in a very special limited-edition Schott double rider style.
You probably used too much and didn’t buff it out after it dried. Any pics of your result?
I sold the jacket. I did not use too much and I did buff the shit out of it trying to get rid of the fake look.
PS - I did waterborne coatings for 35 years professionally, so I understand that in vast majority of cases thinner is better.
That’s interesting. If you weren’t pleased why didn’t you simply wipe it with a wet cloth? Urad is not permanent by any means. It’s meant to fade and dissolve/ be reapplied. I’ve used it on 30 or more jackets. Never had it appear as sparkly. These all were Urad’ed.
I’m not trying to deny your experience but I also don’t see any of the qualities you mention in any of the jackets I’ve used it on.
Just a thought.....I wonder if it could be related to the tannage or particular leathers or the finishing applied as part of the actual production of the leather or applied by a maker as part of their final touches? Not often but once or twice I have had lets say interesting interactions based on those factors. Either I didnt do my research or they were vintage and no data available on what they had gone through originally or what previous owners may have done to them.
Might well be though in my experience obernaufs oil, which I also use fairly regularly, is far less predictable.
Could be because you used it on stripped or worn hides. Substrate matters a great deal in the final look of the coating. I used it on a decent-looking black British sheepskin. In fact, after thinking about it, I think this is the main reason for the difference in our experience. So people should be super-careful on what type of hide they are using Urad.
Last edited:
Indeed. Although I’m always interested to hear why people don’t like to use it. For me it’s always been a great last step in restoration, or finishing of a dyed jacket. The stuff doesn’t get much love but Dena turned me on to it and I’ve used it ever since. I do like Urad’s conditioners too. Tenderly is great stuff but I find oils go a bit further. I am not a Urad shill!
Paging @handymike for his perspective on Urad.
Will you know exactly what his opinion is on URAD...... (I agree with him)
Not exactly. I do know he does not like it, but I'd like to know exactly why, and on what hides he used it.
I read his opinion a few years ago, (just in case he is not available) a thread on conditioners as I recall
lol. The Vanson I sold you (pictured in this thread) was only made presentable by multiple coats Urad. It was otherwise an absolute sun baked dog turd.
Similar threads
