Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Show us your suits

^^I don't quite get it, Baron. Why was that configuration used, and why do you think it was quite common on British suits of that era?

Well, the trousers pictured illustrate it well. Where the fly-most button would attach to the waistband is exactly where the hook for the closure tab is positioned making it impossible to put the button there. So it would have to go inside. As you know, placement of the buttons is quite important to achieve the most satisfactory drape when wearing suspenders.

Obviously I think it was quite common - when the suspender tab was that long - because i've seen many of them with that button configuration. It's a bit like trousers that sometimes come up on American suits - with the rear suspender buttons on the inside but the front ones outside the waistband.


I also am quite unclear as to the date on the suit; the "date" would be in the box under "date". The 4/32/30 is almost certainly the trousers size as suggested by HH above.
 

S_M_Cumberworth

One of the Regulars
Messages
114
Location
Japan, formerly Los Angeles
Good Morning Mr Cumberworth.

Nice whistle, Sir, but I was just wondering where you ascertained the manufacture date from?
If you are referring to the '32' shown on the label, I believe that is the the trouser waist size, when it left Monty's Emporium anyway.
Any chance of a photo of the Burton brand label?

Best Regards
HH.

You're absolutely right. It seems my desire for the suit to be that old got the better of my observational skills.

I've taken the suit to be pressed, but I'll photograph the Burton label when I get it back. Are there features of the label that would indicate its production date?
 

Clabbergirl

One of the Regulars
Messages
227
Location
Nashville, TN
I've been browsing this thread and while I love the clothing you boys are sporting, all I can think is 'I've never seen so many good-looking men in one place before!' Where were you guys when I was single?!! I think the hats, the braces, waistcoats, wingtips - ALL of it is wonderfully handsome, and I love seeing how creative gents can be, especially when they take pride in their appearance. Keep it up, fellas. And thank you for sharing your style with all of us.
 

Widebrim

I'll Lock Up
Well, the trousers pictured illustrate it well. Where the fly-most button would attach to the waistband is exactly where the hook for the closure tab is positioned making it impossible to put the button there. So it would have to go inside. As you know, placement of the buttons is quite important to achieve the most satisfactory drape when wearing suspenders.

Obviously I think it was quite common - when the suspender tab was that long - because i've seen many of them with that button configuration. It's a bit like trousers that sometimes come up on American suits - with the rear suspender buttons on the inside but the front ones outside the waistband.

Put into that context, Baron, the above makes sense. Regarding the American arrangement of suspender buttons, my father's 1946 suit has the opposite configuration than of that mentioned: rear buttons on the outside, front on the inside...
 

Benny Holiday

My Mail is Forwarded Here
Messages
3,795
Location
Sydney Australia
I've been browsing this thread and while I love the clothing you boys are sporting, all I can think is 'I've never seen so many good-looking men in one place before!' Where were you guys when I was single?!! I think the hats, the braces, waistcoats, wingtips - ALL of it is wonderfully handsome, and I love seeing how creative gents can be, especially when they take pride in their appearance. Keep it up, fellas. And thank you for sharing your style with all of us.

Thanks for joining us Clabbergirl. Lovely to have you here and thank you for your kind encouragement!
 

Matt_the_chap

One of the Regulars
Messages
129
Location
Sheffield, England
Here's some photos of the first vintage suit I bought, a 1970s Burton. It's very good to wear, without flared trousers and seems, at least to my untutored eye to be fairly classic in design.

It's in a medium weight cloth, I might estimate 13 to 14oz, with rayon lining. I attached braces buttons myself, due to it only having waist-adjusters. When I've got photos I'll upload the rest of my collection.

photoshoot3.jpg


photoshoot5.jpg


photoshoot1.jpg
 

Bugsy

One Too Many
Messages
1,126
Location
Sacramento/San Francisco Bay Area
Here's some photos of the first vintage suit I bought, a 1970s Burton. It's very good to wear, without flared trousers and seems, at least to my untutored eye to be fairly classic in design.

It's in a medium weight cloth, I might estimate 13 to 14oz, with rayon lining. I attached braces buttons myself, due to it only having waist-adjusters. When I've got photos I'll upload the rest of my collection.

photoshoot3.jpg


photoshoot5.jpg


photoshoot1.jpg

Very elegant and classic.
 

Widebrim

I'll Lock Up
From today, one of my favorite thrift store finds. SB heavy-weight, "rough" wool," blue-ish gray, with light burgandy pin-stripes, c.early '50s(?). I call it my Cry Danger suit, because it reminds me of the one that Dick Powell wore in that 1951 movie. The jacket needs to be let out a tad, but otherwise it is a pretty good fit (about a 40R, with 33" inseam trousers).

Photo15-1.jpg
Photo12-2.jpg
Photo13-3.jpg

Rear suspender buttons are also on the inside.
Photo16-1.jpg
Photo14-1.jpg
2" cuffs (pants are actually grayer).
Photo15-2.jpg
Photo18.jpg
Photo17.jpg

Photo19.jpg
Original price of $44.50.
 
Last edited:

S_M_Cumberworth

One of the Regulars
Messages
114
Location
Japan, formerly Los Angeles
From today, one of my favorite thrift store finds. SB heavy-weight, "rough" wool," blue-ish gray, with light burgandy pin-stripes, c.early '50s(?). I call it my Cry Danger suit, because it reminds me of the one that Dick Powell wore in that 1951 movie. The jacket needs to be let out a tad, but otherwise it is a pretty good fit (about a 40R, with 33" inseam trousers).

Photo15-1.jpg
Photo12-2.jpg
Photo13-3.jpg

Rear suspender buttons are also on the inside.
Photo16-1.jpg
Photo14-1.jpg
2" cuffs (pants are actually grayer).
Photo15-2.jpg
Photo18.jpg
Photo17.jpg

Photo19.jpg
Original price of $44.50.

That's a fantastic find. I've never found anything good at an L.A. thrift store. And at an original price of $44.50, that must be a quality suit. And the fabric is wonderful. Looks good on ya!
 

Matt_the_chap

One of the Regulars
Messages
129
Location
Sheffield, England
The photos were taken last summer, when I was lucky enough to participate in a summer school programme run by Eton College. On the Sunday of the two week course we had options of leisure activities after worship, and I chose the 'Artistic Photoshoot' option. I've got big A3 photopaper prints of them lying around somewhere.

Thanks for the compliments on the suit!
 

Mr. Garrulus

One of the Regulars
Messages
108
Location
N/A
Got myself this suit last week. It is more more of dark blue colour than black like the picture shows. The label has the date of October 1963.

SIRSuit1963.jpg


It also had some old matches from a restaurant in the breast pocket.:p
 

HeyMoe

Practically Family
Messages
698
Location
Central Vermont
Grey checked 100% wool suit with thin light blue lines making largeish squares. Spit shined cap toe oxfords, vintage brown, green, blue silk tie and the Stetson. Suit is 50-60s. Sorry about the photo quality, I will get more in better lighting this weekend.

The sleeves are a tad bit too long, I will get them shortened a bit soon.

suitv.jpg
 
Last edited:

Matt_the_chap

One of the Regulars
Messages
129
Location
Sheffield, England
1960s Prince of Wales Check Suit

I've been very ill recently with some awful cold/flu hybrid disease. I went walking today to try and clear the cobwebs and got a few good photos of the suit I wore:

walking1.jpg


walking2.jpg


walking5.jpg


walking4.jpg


walking3.jpg


walking6.jpg


It was made in 1960 by 'Lesley and Roberts, 16 St. George Street, Hanover Square, London'.

Oddly despite the jacket being fairly spacious the waistcoat and trousers are tight around the waist. I'll have to have them taken out by my seamstress who has worked wonders with the clothes I've taken to her before. Sadly it's a bit mothed and dirty but it's only really saved for occasions such as these so it's levels of smartness are never really in question.

It's missing a few buttons too in places but I repaired the middle button on the jacket. It's also got working cuff-buttons on the first two along with a fairly hefty cotton lining with silk in the sleeves. The jacket is a 2 on 3 with remarkably classic cut throughout. I can only assume it was made for a very traditional gent' indeed.

And the cigarettes? Gauloises Brunes without filters. Sheer bliss if I've ever bought it outside of vintage clothing/general objects.

Edit: Missed my favourite photo - the second.
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
109,097
Messages
3,074,096
Members
54,091
Latest member
toptvsspala
Top