PhilS
One of the Regulars
- Messages
- 237
- Location
- Upper West Side Gotham City
So-so. WARNING: Potential Spoiler Alert.
I saw the movie over the weekend and though there is a lot to admire I can't really recommend it. The problem is entirely with the script, which bounced around Hollywood for a long time.
SPOILER ALERT
(Not really a spoiler, but close enough).
The fundamental flaw is Krasinski's character is far too nice a guy, and his asserted sin far too benign, to justify what Clooney and Zellwegger do to him. Or there needed to be more motivation for Zellwegger to trash him as she does. She looks bad, Clooney looks bad backing her, and the denouement falls somewhat flat. (On a related note, what 1920's newspaper would go out of its way to attack a reputed war hero, anyway?).
Nice hats, some wisecracking repartee, and a bevy of appealing actors make the movie an okay 2 1/2 stars, but it could have been so much more. I agree with the reviewers who say Clooney deserves credit for trying.
I saw the movie over the weekend and though there is a lot to admire I can't really recommend it. The problem is entirely with the script, which bounced around Hollywood for a long time.
SPOILER ALERT
(Not really a spoiler, but close enough).
The fundamental flaw is Krasinski's character is far too nice a guy, and his asserted sin far too benign, to justify what Clooney and Zellwegger do to him. Or there needed to be more motivation for Zellwegger to trash him as she does. She looks bad, Clooney looks bad backing her, and the denouement falls somewhat flat. (On a related note, what 1920's newspaper would go out of its way to attack a reputed war hero, anyway?).
Nice hats, some wisecracking repartee, and a bevy of appealing actors make the movie an okay 2 1/2 stars, but it could have been so much more. I agree with the reviewers who say Clooney deserves credit for trying.