Up for sale is a beautiful vintage Milan hat body. I bought this hat to redo for myself but unfortunately it turned out to be too big. It was a 1950's Champ. I steamed it back to open crown (it was a tall porkpie at one time). All it needs is a sweatband and ribbon and you can have a wonderful...
This is one of the neatest flanges I have seen. Its labeled " Swing......7.........2 1/4, which means its a Swing profile, size 7, and can flange brims up to 2 1/4 inches wide. I have flanged a few hats on this one and the result is EXACTLY like the Knox Backswing of the late 1930's. The rear...
For sale is a great size 7 1/2 flange. Its a really beautiful flange profile. It reads 508.....7 1/2.......2 1/2, which means its a 508 profile, sized 7 1/2, and can flange brims up to 2 1/2 inches wide.
Here's a great block that has a STRAIGHTER and FLATTER profile than a 52. Its one of the straightest blocks I have ever owned. It reads " 5 3/4 7 1/4 Columbia" on the bottom. That means its 5 3/4 inches tall, its a size 7 1/4, and its a Columbia profile.
Alan, I just remembered I had pictures of this late 20's Stetson store stand-up sign. The crown dimensions, brim dimensions, bow design, stationary wind trolley button, and overwelt with hidden stitch remind me of your Gold Medal. If I didn't know any better, I would say this ad was for your hat.
Ah, I see. My mistake. Then in my mind, the chain stitch confirms that the overwelt was originally done using a factory blind stitch. Not saying that a hatter couldn't have cut the brim at one time and used a blind stitch machine to create an overwelt, but the work and overwelt on this hat looks...
Here's my take on this....for what its worth. A blind stitch machine hides the stitches by not going through the other side of the material, but rather stitches on an "angle" into the felt and attaches the stitch somewhat through the bottom material. Usually on a chain stitch created by some...
Absolutely. I totally agree that in the days before CAM/CNC there was a slight difference in the production of a companies line. Maybe even a 3%-5% difference. I don't believe that there is any "true" #52 or true Columbia. Also peoples preference comes into play as well. I will say though, I...
I also respectfully disagree. I have owned/handled/sold hundreds of vintage hats and I can honestly tell you that I have noticed uneven brims, un-sanded edges, misaligned stitches, etc. While vintage hats (especially pre-ww2) are FAR superior than anything made today, they were being made on a...
I have seen that as well, but many block manufactures designated a difference between 52 and Columbia. If you have ever seen a Columbia and a 52, they are most definitely not the same. Perhaps National Hatters Supply Co was one of those companies who produced the very straight shouldered 52...
That would make sense to me....but we on the lounge are hat connoisseurs and things like a 1/16 of a difference matter to us. I feel most people in the past (and the present) bought a hat, tossed it around, and when it wore out, bought a new one. I doubt too many people, unless they loved hats...
I love that hat. Its one of my favorites on the lounge. As to the roughness of the cut.......I think its original. Obviously I have no way to prove that, but I have owned numerous vintage hats with curled brims and overwelts/underwelts. It seems that some of my early Stetsons and other...
I just assumed the original rounding jack design was pretty standard across the board of all manufactures. I wonder if a rounding jack was ever built with a wider arch? [huh]
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.