Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

blewnote

One of the Regulars
Messages
282
If the sweatband is in good shape and well attached. Pull the liner and try a gas bath (or a sink sprayer to the outside, lol, I won’t tell anyone. It’s no different then wearing it in the rain)

For real. If the sweatband is in decent shape a gas bath won't hurt it a bit. I recently got a large enamel washing pan to just do minor cleaning with gas, that's the first suggestion in the Ermatinger book, just to hit it with a brush dipped in gasoline and see what you can get out before bathing the whole thing. But if you pull the liner you can't really hurt the rest of the hat (and I think Bob Hufford may even douse them without removing the liner, maybe he can chime in about that).
 

Judgmentalist

One Too Many
Messages
1,111
For real. If the sweatband is in decent shape a gas bath won't hurt it a bit. I recently got a large enamel washing pan to just do minor cleaning with gas, that's the first suggestion in the Ermatinger book, just to hit it with a brush dipped in gasoline and see what you can get out before bathing the whole thing. But if you pull the liner you can't really hurt the rest of the hat (and I think Bob Hufford may even douse them without removing the liner, maybe he can chime in about that).
I’m having a bit of off-cycle whiskey haze at the moment but Ermatinger book is pulling some strings. Hopefully I will remember to find this tomorrow.
 

blewnote

One of the Regulars
Messages
282
@blewnote maybe you can tell me how good I am getting at dating Stetsons....

I’m going to go out on a limb and guess that this one was offered for sale by Clark the Hatter of Kansas City, MO on April 20, 1952. My dad would have been -3 years old at the time. This kind of boggles my mind sometimes.

Clark the Hatter was a longtime Kansas City shop, in business from at least the turn of the century and still operating when this hat was apparently tagged in 1952. I haven't found a storefront photo yet, but I did buy a matchbook cover to go with this hat.

This may be my first restoration attempt. Unless someone talks me out of it. The felt on this hat is very nice, with no mothing at all. Dirty though. The liner is in good shape, unless you count the yellowing of the onion skin.

I’m pretty sure the sticker lying on the table is dated 4/20/1952, but unfortunately I couldn’t unfold it far enough to get a good photograph without risking destroying what was left of it. I may look into some kind of document restoration or something. I'd like to be able to put that sticker back together so that the date is readable.

The felt is quality, and both the liner and sweatband are clean and worth saving. So I’m torn between:

a.) jump in the deep end
b.) don’t mess this hat up, dummy

What do you guys think?

View attachment 811694 View attachment 811695 View attachment 811696 View attachment 811697 View attachment 811698 View attachment 811699 View attachment 811700 View attachment 811701 View attachment 811702 View attachment 811703


Nice one! I couldn't say for sure what the numbers on that tag represent, as we can't see the whole number and we don't know what that store's inventorying system was. It looks mainly like a price tag to me, with the lot number the hat came from, perhaps it's the date it was brought into the store inventory, perhaps it's just a stock number to keep track of what hat they were going to sell. All that said, I would be inclined to believe it's a hat from 1952 or earlier.

But I'm curious if you can say why. What I keep trying to get you to do is look at the tells the hat has for dating:

The long oval tags are hard to use for dating because they don't seem to follow the path outlined in the thread on how to date Stetsons by size tag. So in this case that's no good.

What does the liner tell you? It's not just fabric, there's a material over it. What is that material? When did Stetson use that in its hats?

What does the inventory tag tell you? How old are the hats other loungers have posted that have that style inventory tag?
 

jeffgarf

One Too Many
Messages
1,726
Location
Jerusalem, Israel
I’m having a bit of off-cycle whiskey haze at the moment but Ermatinger book is pulling some strings. Hopefully I will remember to find this tomorrow.
and I think Bob Hufford may even douse them without removing the liner, maybe he can chime in about that).
I also leave the liner in during the bath. It never hurt a thing.
 

Judgmentalist

One Too Many
Messages
1,111
Nice one! I couldn't say for sure what the numbers on that tag represent, as we can't see the whole number and we don't know what that store's inventorying system was. It looks mainly like a price tag to me, with the lot number the hat came from, perhaps it's the date it was brought into the store inventory, perhaps it's just a stock number to keep track of what hat they were going to sell. All that said, I would be inclined to believe it's a hat from 1952 or earlier.

But I'm curious if you can say why. What I keep trying to get you to do is look at the tells the hat has for dating:

The long oval tags are hard to use for dating because they don't seem to follow the path outlined in the thread on how to date Stetsons by size tag. So in this case that's no good.

What does the liner tell you? It's not just fabric, there's a material over it. What is that material? When did Stetson use that in its hats?

What does the inventory tag tell you? How old are the hats other loungers have posted that have that style inventory tag?
@blewnote is going to make me ****** vegetables. Okay fine. Today is the day. Or rather tomorrow is the day. I will do the work on this tomorrow and try to defend my position. :) thank you sir, for forcing me out of my comfort zone lol.

So the onion skin liner, I think, was replaced with plastic in the early 50s. I will have to pattern recognition on the labels tomorrow. :)
 

blewnote

One of the Regulars
Messages
282
@blewnote is going to make me ****** vegetables. Okay fine. Today is the day. Or rather tomorrow is the day. I will do the work on this tomorrow and try to defend my position. :) thank you sir, for forcing me out of my comfort zone lol.
So the onion skin liner, I think, was replaced with plastic in the early 50s. I will have to pattern recognition on the labels tomorrow. :)

Attaboy!
 

Judgmentalist

One Too Many
Messages
1,111
@blewnote is going to make me ****** vegetables. Okay fine. Today is the day. Or rather tomorrow is the day. I will do the work on this tomorrow and try to defend my position. :) thank you sir, for forcing me out of my comfort zone lol.

So the onion skin liner, I think, was replaced with plastic in the early 50s. I will have to pattern recognition on the labels tomorrow. :)
Very curious what the forum has against e ating v egetables
 

blewnote

One of the Regulars
Messages
282
Alright, here's a new one for me today. I took a wild guess that it was a panama and not a shantung or some other type of straw and it paid off. Haven't seen any Resistol Monte Cristis posted here before, so I don't really have much to go off of for this one.

The leather is nice, it looks to be a very fine weave. From what I've read in the Resistol thread, the shield with Byer & Rolnick was used until the mid 60s but this leather seems nicer than the San Antonio type one I have from the mid-60s. It has a gold line on it though, which I feel like is something I associate with much newer hats so I'm a bit perplexed.

I peeked under the sweatband a little and don't see any tags. If I had to hazard a guess I'd go with 1950s for age, but I'm really just making a stab in the dark. Please chime in anyone if they know more about Resistol history!

It's kinda dirty and the brim is wonky. I'm about to post in the Ask A Question thread to see if anyone has tips on cleaning panamas, because I haven't found what appears to be great instructions in the discussions here (at least my searching hasn't dug anything up that was convincing enough I want to try it) and I may bite the ****** on this one and see what Optimo would charge to fix it up for me if no one has good suggestions.

I have seen the higher grade panamas discussed but I am not sure I ever handled one until today and I guess I can see what all the fuss is about now. It's a pretty amazingly fine weave. I don't know that I care enough to want to cough up what they cost new, but this one came at a steal.

The last pic is with my Northwest Panama brim next to it for comparison. Anyone have any thoughts on why it looks like there's stuff in between the weaves on the Resistol? That's just years of accumulated ***k? Shellac? Or do they do something to the fine weaves to help give them strength?

PXL_20260922_025713239.jpg
PXL_20260922_014659354.jpg
PXL_20260922_014708278.jpg
PXL_20260922_024906396.jpg
 
Last edited:

Judgmentalist

One Too Many
Messages
1,111
Alright, here's a new one for me today. I took a wild guess that it was a panama and not a shantung or some other type of straw and it paid off. Haven't seen any Resistol Monte Cristis posted here before, so I don't really have much to go off of for this one.

The leather is nice, it looks to be a very fine weave. From what I've read in the Resistol thread, the shield with Byer & Rolnick was used until the mid 60s but this leather seems nicer than the San Antonio type one I have from the mid-60s. It has a gold line on it though, which I feel like is something I associate with much newer hats so I'm a bit perplexed.

I peaked under the sweatband a little and don't see any tags. If I had to hazard a guess I'd go with 1950s for age, but I'm really just making a stab in the dark. Please chime in anyone if they know more about Resistol history!

It's kinda dirty and the brim is wonky. I'm about to post in the Ask A Question thread to see if anyone has tips on cleaning panamas, because I haven't found what appears to be great instructions in the discussions here (at least my searching hasn't dug anything up that was convincing enough I want to try it) and I may bite the ****** on this one and see what Optimo would charge to fix it up for me if no one has good suggestions.

I have seen the higher grade panamas discussed but I am not sure I ever handled one until today and I guess I can see what all the fuss is about now. It's a pretty amazingly fine weave. I don't know that I care enough to want to cough up what they cost new, but this one came at a steal.

The last pic is with my Northwest Panama brim next to it for comparison. Anyone have any thoughts on why it looks like there's stuff in between the weaves on the Resistol? That's just years of accumulated ***k? Shellac? Or do they do something to the fine weaves to help give them strength?

View attachment 811715 View attachment 811716 View attachment 811717 View attachment 811718

Ooohh… that is cool. Get pictures of a ruler against the sidewall of the crown. One vertical and one horizontal, parallel to the weave.

No idea if Resistol did anything weird to Panamas, but as far as I’m aware there is no reason for there to be any substance embedded in the weave.
 

Judgmentalist

One Too Many
Messages
1,111
Not exactly new, but I just got this one back with the new ribbon.


PHD — this one originally had a bright red pugaree, and I asked Mr. Fawcett to make this ribbon for me and send it along with my new hat. If you aren’t aware, Mr. Fawcett occasionally has a new-production rabbit-felt hat pop up on eBay, and the account that lists those hats also sometimes offers pre-made ribbons. That’s why I felt reasonably comfortable asking him for one that would suit this purpose.


I then gave both the hat and ribbon to a friend of mine, who took approximately one eternity to swap them out. Apparently it wasn’t a high-priority task for her, but then again she refused to charge me anything despite my best efforts to the contrary, so… here we are.


Apparently she had some trouble getting the ribbon to lie completely flat against the hat. We needed to stay with a fairly tall ribbon because the pugaree that had been there before was tall as well.


Still, I should get to wear it a couple of times before we pack the Panamas away for the season. The sweatbands on these aren’t my favorite, but they do the job. I may also need to give the brim a little steam to put some more fedora shape back into it.

PHD Panama with replacement ribbon by Mr. Fawcett — much appreciated.
IMG_6214.JPG
IMG_6208.JPG
IMG_6219.jpg
 
Messages
13,673
Alright, here's a new one for me today. I took a wild guess that it was a panama and not a shantung or some other type of straw and it paid off. Haven't seen any Resistol Monte Cristis posted here before, so I don't really have much to go off of for this one.

The leather is nice, it looks to be a very fine weave. From what I've read in the Resistol thread, the shield with Byer & Rolnick was used until the mid 60s but this leather seems nicer than the San Antonio type one I have from the mid-60s. It has a gold line on it though, which I feel like is something I associate with much newer hats so I'm a bit perplexed.

I peeked under the sweatband a little and don't see any tags. If I had to hazard a guess I'd go with 1950s for age, but I'm really just making a stab in the dark. Please chime in anyone if they know more about Resistol history!

It's kinda dirty and the brim is wonky. I'm about to post in the Ask A Question thread to see if anyone has tips on cleaning panamas, because I haven't found what appears to be great instructions in the discussions here (at least my searching hasn't dug anything up that was convincing enough I want to try it) and I may bite the ****** on this one and see what Optimo would charge to fix it up for me if no one has good suggestions.

I have seen the higher grade panamas discussed but I am not sure I ever handled one until today and I guess I can see what all the fuss is about now. It's a pretty amazingly fine weave. I don't know that I care enough to want to cough up what they cost new, but this one came at a steal.

The last pic is with my Northwest Panama brim next to it for comparison. Anyone have any thoughts on why it looks like there's stuff in between the weaves on the Resistol? That's just years of accumulated ***k? Shellac? Or do they do something to the fine weaves to help give them strength?

View attachment 811715 View attachment 811716 View attachment 811717 View attachment 811718
That is gorgeous. What a fine weave.
 

Judgmentalist

One Too Many
Messages
1,111
This is a very cool hat from a brand I had never heard of before @jeffgarf brought it to my attention.

It’s a Portis “Crest” in medium brown, size 7 3/8, with a “Swan’s Down Finish” liner and “Swansback Water Repellent Cushion Band” sweatband treatment. The retailer was Wagner Bros. in Ellinwood, Kansas.

The Portis Brothers Hat Co. was founded in Chicago in 1914 by five brothers: Isadore, Arnold, Theodore, Lyon, and Henry. Drawing on their previous experience in the hat business, they built the company around an unusually cooperative management structure—“All for one, one for all.” For more than 25 years, the five brothers reportedly drew identical salaries and held equal votes in company decisions.

With headquarters in Chicago and a major plant in Michigan City, Indiana, Portis eventually became one of the larger American hat manufacturers, ranking around tenth nationally and producing roughly a million hats a year at its peak. The company remained independent until the late 1960s, when Portis was acquired by Stevens Hats of St. Joseph, Missouri.

The Crest was one of Portis’ named lines. Some surviving examples have the same pugaree-like twisted ribbon treatment, with a mother-of-pearl ring applied over the crossover. Mine has the pugaree treatment without the ring.

The hat still has its United Hatters union label under the sweat, along with factory/lot number 218039. I haven’t found a reliable Portis numbering system that lets me decode that into a date.

Based on the Crest designation, Swan’s Down/Swansback branding, union label, retailer history, and the overall proportions, I’d put it broadly in the late 1940s through the 1950s. I’d be interested to hear what the Portis experts think.

The felt is probably my favorite part. “Swan’s Down” appears to have been Portis’ name for this particularly soft, smooth finish, and this one really does have a lovely hand to it. Tall crown, generous bound brim, narrow ribbon, and very clean period proportions.

Also worth noting that “Swan’s Down Finish” and “Swansback Water Repellent” are two different Portis terms on the same hat—the former referring to the felt finish, the latter to the water-repellent treatment/cushion-band system.

Very cool hat, and a lot of fun to wear.

Thanks, Jeff. :)

Portis “Crest”
Portis Crest (1).JPG
Portis Crest (14).JPG
Portis Crest (2).JPG
Portis Crest (3).JPG
Portis Crest (4).JPG
Portis Crest (5).JPG
Portis Crest (6).JPG
Portis Crest (7).JPG
Portis Crest (8).JPG
Portis Crest (9).JPG
 
Last edited:

Judgmentalist

One Too Many
Messages
1,111
This is a very cool hat from a brand I had never heard of before @jeffgarf brought it to my attention.

It’s a Portis “Crest” in medium brown, size 7 3/8, with a “Swan’s Down Finish” liner and “Swansback Water Repellent Cushion Band” sweatband treatment. The retailer was Wagner Bros. in Ellinwood, Kansas.

The Portis Brothers Hat Co. was founded in Chicago in 1914 by five brothers: Isadore, Arnold, Theodore, Lyon, and Henry. Drawing on their previous experience in the hat business, they built the company around an unusually cooperative management structure—“All for one, one for all.” For more than 25 years, the five brothers reportedly drew identical salaries and held equal votes in company decisions.

With headquarters in Chicago and a major plant in Michigan City, Indiana, Portis eventually became one of the larger American hat manufacturers, ranking around tenth nationally and producing roughly a million hats a year at its peak. The company remained independent until the late 1960s, when Portis was acquired by Stevens Hats of St. Joseph, Missouri.

The Crest was one of Portis’ named lines. Some surviving 1940s Crest examples have a particularly neat detail: instead of a conventional ribbon bow, the ribbon is gathered through a mother-of-pearl ring. Mine has the more conventional bow treatment, so apparently Crest wasn’t limited to that one configuration.

The hat still has its United Hatters union label under the sweat, along with factory/lot number 218039. I haven’t found a reliable Portis numbering system that lets me decode that into a date.

Based on the Crest designation, Swan’s Down/Swansback branding, union label, retailer history, and the overall proportions, I’d put it broadly in the late 1940s through the 1950s. I’d be interested to hear what the Portis experts think.

The felt is probably my favorite part. “Swan’s Down” appears to have been Portis’ name for this particularly soft, smooth finish, and this one really does have a lovely hand to it. Tall crown, generous bound brim, narrow ribbon, and very clean period proportions.

Also worth noting that “Swan’s Down Finish” and “Swansback Water Repellent” are two different Portis terms on the same hat—the former referring to the felt finish, the latter to the water-repellent treatment/cushion-band system.

Very cool hat, and a lot of fun to wear.

Thanks, Jeff. :)

Portis “Crest”
View attachment 812006 View attachment 812007 View attachment 812008 View attachment 812009 View attachment 812010 View attachment 812011 View attachment 812012 View attachment 812013 View attachment 812014 View attachment 812015
A few more photos.
Portis Crest (10).JPG
Portis Crest (11).JPG
Portis Crest (12).JPG
Portis Crest (13).JPG


I haven’t yet found a photo of the building actually operating as Wagner Bros., but here’s an older shot and a modern view of the Cyclone Building where the store was located.
a.jpg
b.jpg


Here is a shot of one showing the MOP ring
d.jpg
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
115,485
Messages
3,194,817
Members
59,132
Latest member
FionaBassl
Top