GWD
One Too Many
- Messages
- 1,642
- Location
- Evergreen, Co
Fair Enough! Thanks Alan!
Lefty said:Tortswon,
Respectfully, if you pick up a few of the older (60s or earlier) Stetsons, you'll see that while the exact meaning of the X was still a mystery, it really did mean a difference in quality. You can easily feel the difference within the brand. I haven't handled a wide variety of other brands that toyed with the X, so I cannot speak to their use of it. At some point, Stetson (Hatco) just went crazy with the X, and now you can buy a pretty lousy straw in 10x - whatever that means.
Lefty said:At some point, Stetson (Hatco) just went crazy with the X, and now you can buy a pretty lousy straw in 10x - whatever that means.
tortswon said:Lefty, I think you are making my point. With the dearth of hat shops, where can a guy go to physically pick up hats to compare? I live in Philadelphia, which is not exactly a small town. I do not know of anywhere I can go and pick up a modern Stetson locally let alone a vintage Stetson for comparison purposes. There is no one I can speak with face to face to explain differences to me, other than possibly a member here at the Lounge.
I remember as a kid going into hat stores all along South Street and seeing hats of all descriptions which I could pick up, try on, and be informed about by someone with decades in the business.
Bottom line is that when I see "X's" in a hat description I am not being informed merely because I am inexperienced but because it means different things to different manufacturers. This lack of consistency is frustrating to someone new to this hobby and, I believe, ultimately harmful to the continuation of the hobby because it is a standard without meaning to those not in the business of manufacturing hats. Best, Sam
Lefty said:Bud,
I'm glad you got the answer you were looking for, and it's great that you got to talk to someone at the company who could set the record straight. However, should I need to talk to vice-president in charge of mystical information at Hatco to find out whether my sweatband is made of plastic?
Tortswon,
As I said, the business of the Xs having to do with quality is limited to vintage. Anything after some point in the late 60s, and you've got a heap of hats with anywhere from 3 to 100 Xs that mean nothing.
Hatco,
So, now the X that means nothing that you can tell us in a dress hat means a different kind of nothing in a Western? Maybe they should be Ws. Of course, when there's no information behind an X (or W), then X=0, making a 100x worth...
HATCO said:I'm not sure I understand the first part addressed to me. I'm saying western hats require a different type of finishing. They require more stiffener and need to be harder than your typical Dress hat.
I think I have a fairly thick skin, I take constructive criticism of our hats to heart and hopefully as others may profess I am trying to improve them, but if this turns into a bash fest like above, I'll be honest it's not worth my time. There wasn't anything polite in the above post and it wasn't constructive. If I misread your tone and comments Lefty I apologize but thats the way I took them.
Lefty said:As to the first point, the current regime of hatco may not have created the X mess, but they are upholding it. By using the X in any context (western, dress, straw, or otherwise), but refusing to define it, it becomes a meaningless advertising tool, like "new", "improved", or "ultimate". You've stated that the basis of the mystery is to not allow the blend formula to fall into the hands of the competition. This, however, keeps everyone in the dark. As I previously stated, Stetson no longer has the reputation where I'll just believe that a 10x is superior to a 3x.
As to criticism, you may be Hatco's representative here, but you are not Hatco - whether you are an employee, officer, director, stock holder, etc. I am unaware as to Hatco's current status (whether it's publicly traded, closely held, etc.), but am certain that, based upon the broad range of its products, it is comprised of more than a few individuals. This attempt at personalization of a corporation is a nice public relations gesture, but will not be mistaken as the casual conversation of the struggling hatter working out of his own store or home. My criticisms are pointed toward long standing company policies. If you are going to take personal offense at my comments, then you must take personal responsibility for your company's choices, both past and present.
It is not my intention to insult you personally. It is my intention to bring to your attention the reason for my frustration, as a consumer, with the company's X policy. Remember that you started this thread with the statement that the company doesn't want to make information about its own product public.