CaramelSmoothie
Practically Family
- Messages
- 892
- Location
- With my Hats
That was a good one.
It cracks me up when I imagine the looks on people's faces as they read that! LOL!
That was a good one.
The best I can remember; it' is a little used military tradition. I found the following on Wikipedia.
A riderless horse or caparisoned horse (in reference to its ornamental coverings, which have a detailed protocol of their own) is a single horse, without a rider, and with boots reversed in the stirrups, which sometimes accompanies a funeral procession. The horse follows the caisson carrying the casket.[1] A riderless horse can also be featured in military parades to symbolize fallen soldiers. In Australia for example, it is traditional for a riderless horse known as the 'Lone Charger' to lead the annual Anzac Day marches.[2] It was used during Ronald Reagan's funeral.
HI Edward
It's a military tradition, one that extends to other military commanders (including the commander in chief). Wikipedia says that Colonel is considered the minimum. I would guess that a lot of the funerals that included the riderless horse take place at Arlington.
Later
911.
Af
I remember talking to one of my ex-fiance's grandmother when Jimmy Stewart died. She described how he was one of the last of "her" generation...almost all of the politicians, popular singers, movie stars, celebrities, etc, that were representative of her years on the planet were gone. It was a very lonely feeling, she said.
The people who were adults at the time of JFK's death, if still living today, would be about the same age the WW1 vets were when I was a child. For some reason that thought chills me to the bone.
WW1 didn't seem like ancient history when I was growing up -- but now that the link of knowing people who were there is gone, it might as well be as ancient as the Wars of the Maccabees. It won't be long before the death of JFK is as remote from the people living as the death of Lincoln is to us today.
Only 20 more years till they open the files.
The reaction to Kennedy's death, here in the UK, was similar to that when we heard of the Twin Towers atrocity. If you google: Was JFK an Anglophile, you will find he was, very much so. And he was respected from both sides of our political wings.
Actually, he had a good amount of flight expierience but he lacked an instrument rating
which allows a pilot to 'fly blind'. He hit a 'black hole' which without the use of instruments will cause all but the luckiest of pilots to go down. What would have been an uneventfull flight in daylight turned tragic at nightfall. He had intended to arrive at his destination well before dark but the tardiness of his passengers (wife and sister inlaw) delayed take off. Yes he displayed a serious lack of judgement by trying to beat sunset but he was not quite the buffoon you discribe.
JFK jr was not a 'Kennedy.' His mother saw to it that her children were not raised that way.He wasn't a buffoon, he was a Kennedy. They were famous for their devil may care attitude. They did riskier things than that. Usually they got away with it.
JFKjr. commented before his death, he could not tell how much he actually remembered and how much he had seen on TV through the years. At first I thought that was stupid, but then I realized, I was picturing the funeral procession in color. I imagine, every one here (except for LaMedicine, who saw the procession in person,) saw it on a small Black & White TV. I did not see any color footage until the mid 70s! Now, I have to stop and think to see it in B&W!
I did. Even though TV footage was in B/W, there were plenty of color photos immediately after, in the newspapers (yes, we had them delivered every day then) and magzines like Life and Time and all which all printed special editions, so I think a lot of us would have projected the colors onto the B/W images as soon as.Some times I wonder why I bother! No one actually read my post past the first sentence!
It must be in the blood.JFK jr was not a 'Kennedy.' His mother saw to it that her children were not raised that way.
I think the defining incident that clearly stands out in my memory more than anything else was the Cuban missile crisis from the year before.
I did. Even though TV footage was in B/W, there were plenty of color photos immediately after, in the newspapers (yes, we had them delivered every day then) and magzines like Life and Time and all which all printed special editions, so I think a lot of us would have projected the colors onto the B/W images as soon as.
As for JFK Jr, he was only 3 at the time, so if it hadn't been one of the most dramatic and publicised events of the century, he most likely wouldn't have remembered a lot if any. Just about all of his memory would have been what he had learned from the media. Caroline, on the other hand, was just about to turn 7, so it's likely that she remembers a lot as first hand expreince, as well as memories from the media later on.
All of us youngsters then, lost at least some of our youthful innocence that day.
Thinking back now, I think one of the things that makes this tragedy so well remembered is all the promises that never were realised, all the future that might have been, compared to where we actually are now. Would it all have been the same somehow, anyway, or would it have been very different? A question that will never be answered.
And in a few hours, it will be exactly 50 years.
They both went down live on TV. The only thing that could news did not show happen in real time (although there is home video of it) was the first tower being hit. I distinctly remember watching it burn and then seeing the plane hit the second tower, and then everything after that.Mn, I should have remembered that one - right enough, the second tower did go down live on tv. I suppose Oswald somehow stands out more on the individual level to me because of the directness of it, as distinct from only seeing the plane and the building.... (actually, the image that sticks in my head from 9/11, above all others, is the footage of the folks who jumped. That's the one that still makes me shiver).
They both went down live on TV.
The entire day was terrible beyond belief, but when I mentioned 911 as an example of a televised murder, I was referring to watching on live television as the second plane was flown into the South Tower.
AF
True, but I was replying to the poster who said one building went down on tv. We saw the live murders of those on the second plane, those in the buildings, and the first responders.The entire day was terrible beyond belief, but when I mentioned 911 as an example of a televised murder, I was referring to watching on live television as the second plane was flown into the South Tower.
AF
Ah! Thank-you. Of course, it makes sense that it's a military thing, given the CiC role of the president. It did seem vaguely familiar - I must have seen mention of it at Regan's funeral - I think his was the only presidential funeral I remember seeing coverage of at the time (Nixon died in my era, but I don't recall noticing much coverage of it; I suppose Regan was the first POTUS of whom I was aware, so I would notice these things more with him).