- Messages
- 12,018
- Location
- East of Los Angeles
I'm not absolutely certain, but I'm pretty sure this "regulation" had been in place for several years and for whatever reason(s) the staff had gotten lax about enforcing it. And they never explained why they suddenly chose to beyond, "Because it's a regulation." If they had dealt with it on a case-by-case basis over a longer period of time it might have been better received, but they probably thought it would be easier to spring it on all of us at the same time. Boy, were they wrong.Which is a lesson to anyone attempting to impose a policy before he has carefully considered whether it will stick. Wanna sacrifice yer cred and respect for rules in general? Lay down a law no one will take seriously.
If the whole "Get a haircut" debacle had occurred a decade earlier I'm sure more parents would have sided with the school. But by then they had lived through everything that happened in the 60s and were probably happy their kids were still in school, so a little long hair wasn't such a big deal.Prior to "late-1973 to early-1975"....
A trip to the school boiler room where the vice-principal carrying a flat wooden board administered 6 painful whacks on my behind for failure to follow the school policy. A letter from my parents to the school principal was required in order for me to return to class the following day. When I showed ma the purple marks on my rear cheeks...she replied, "oh honey...I bet that hurt!" I believe she gave me a bag of ice to ease the pain. Back then, parents and teachers were on the same page. So much for the "fabulous fifties"!
As far as the "flat wooden board" treatment, I never experienced it myself but I'm 99% certain my parents would have raised all kinds of hell with any school that allowed that to happen to me. Sure, in my very early days I got swatted on the backside more than a few times when I got out of line at home, but my parents reserved all "rights of discipline" beyond a stern talking-to for themselves to determine.
Last edited: