Questions About the United States Navy Peacoat

[Gamma68]

I don't know if this has been mentioned previously here or in another thread, but I came across a great online archive of an official U.S. Navy publication called "All Hands" (1922-2011). Lots of articles and photos in the issues, particularly from 1942-onward.

In a quick search of the covers, I came across the March 1950 issue (below). Looks like he's wearing a peacoat.

This resource might be helpful for researching peacoats, flight jackets, etc.

http://www.navy.mil/ah_online/department_arch.html

 

[Peacoat]

This is my best guess at the Contract No., based on the photo:

_ _ _ (CTM) 273_ - 0._ - 80-0-58

The tag is so faded now that attempts to read it are fruitless.

Can we assume there was only one contract for each individual year? If so, then another tag for a 1958 coat could supply the missing numerals or letters.

What does "CTM" indicate?

Any tips or advice about how to learn something about the original owner: "WILEY DH 588-76-98" ?

Also, the hanging loop on the inside of the rear collar is broken. What would be a suitable replacement that is robust enough for such a heavy coat? Or do most of you just use wide-shoulder hangers? I've been wearing my peacoat so often lately, I just drape it on a chair (the closet is stuffed).

What I really need are the letters preceding the "(CTM)." They probably are "QM" which would be consistent with a 1958 tag. A 1953 coat would have a prefix of "TAP" and the rest of the contract number would be formatted differently from what you have. I have seen QM precede the (CTM) on several occasions. I am convinced, just as you were when the tag was legible, that this is a 1958 peacoat.

 

[Gamma68]

What I really need are the letters preceding the "(CTM)." They probably are "QM" which would be consistent with a 1958 tag. A 1953 coat would have a prefix of "TAP" and the rest of the contract number would be formatted differently from what you have. I have seen QM precede the (CTM) on several occasions. I am convinced, just as you were when the tag was legible, that this is a 1958 peacoat.

The tag is impossible to read in its current state. Looking more closely at the photo I posted previously, it appears there are two characters preceding (CTM), not three. The second of those two characters looks like it could be a "M", so I'll go with "QM."

Another photo of a 1958 peacoat tag would help if available for posting.

 

[Peacoat]

The "US NAVY" tag was used starting in about 1956. They weren't used prior to then. There is a picture of one in the below link down towards the middle of the page. Also several other US NAVY tags appear below that one. Yours is a 1958 contract.

http://www.thefedoralounge.com/thre...-dating-the-united-states-navy-peacoat.72058/

 

[Spoonbelly]

The tag is impossible to read in its current state. Looking more closely at the photo I posted previously, it appears there are two characters preceding (CTM), not three. The second of those two characters looks like it could be a "M", so I'll go with "QM."

Another photo of a 1958 peacoat tag would help if available for posting.

My '58 is : U.S. NAVY
QM(CTM)-1838 OI or O1 -885-C-58

 

[Gamma68]

Thanks, Spoonbelly.

I'm going to guess my coat label reads QM (CTM) 273 - O.I. 80-0-58

Thanks to everyone for helping verify this information as closely as possible.

 

[Gamma68]

Plate No. 25 at the link below shows a Seaman and Chief Petty Officer "overcoat" (what we'd call a peacoat today) from 1913:

http://www.quarterdeck.org/uniforms/1913/1913 Plates 20-29 Enlisted.pdf

 

[Peacoat]

Thanks, Spoonbelly.

I'm going to guess my coat label reads QM (CTM) 273 - O.I. 80-0-58

Thanks to everyone for helping verify this information as closely as possible.

And you would be guessing correctly. Thanks to Spoon for chiming in.

Plate No. 25 at the link below shows a Seaman and Chief Petty Officer "overcoat" (what we'd call a peacoat today) from 1913:

http://www.quarterdeck.org/uniforms/1913/1913 Plates 20-29 Enlisted.pdf

A good resource. This confirms what we know about the style of the peacoat back then. This is as far back in style as I have been able to go.

If you will notice, the Chief got the long coat and the seaman got the short coat, which we know as a peacoat today. The longer coat evolved into the Bridge Coat worn by officers and chiefs, while the peacoat is worn by enlisted and lower ranked NCOs.

 

[Atticus Finch]

A legible 1958 tag.

 

[Atticus Finch]

Another one.

 

[Atticus Finch]

BTW...this is one of several Defense Agency contract number formats used by manufacturers in the 1950s. I've seen 1957 peacoat tags that followed this same format, but I've never seen one from 1953. But the DA began operation in 1953, so I guess they may exist. In fact, the more I compare the tag at issue with known 1958 examples, the more I think the tag at issue might be the first 1953 tag I've seen.

AF

 

[Doctor Damage]

I just got a copy of this book (see below) from Japan. In the first section it's got a bunch of peacoats and bridge coats shown, from various periods, most from the 1910s. The bridge coats they call "peacoats (long)" and they literally look like standard peacoats with long skirts. They show a bunch of peacoats with flapped hip pockets, as per the pre-war models which Peacoat has discussed in the past. They even show one with hip pockets which has 10 buttons but the bottom 8 spaced lower from the collar, like those civilian coats which are common (by Fidelity and Sterlingwear). The book has little text and most of that's in Japanese, but if you're good at interpreting photos, I suggest the book.

 

[Gamma68]

I recently received a copy of the book "The Vintage Showroom: An Archive of Menswear" by ***n and Luckett. It includes a spread featuring a 1913 U.S. Navy peacoat:

 

[davyjones007]

I don't know if this has been mentioned previously here or in another thread, but I came across a great online archive of an official U.S. Navy publication called "All Hands" (1922-2011). Lots of articles and photos in the issues, particularly from 1942-onward.

In a quick search of the covers, I came across the March 1950 issue (below). Looks like he's wearing a peacoat.

This resource might be helpful for researching peacoats, flight jackets, etc.

http://www.navy.mil/ah_online/department_arch.html

We always looked forward to the new issue of all hands. Great articles and pictures of duty stations and places to take leave. I think you can still get it, but in digital format now.

 

[Gamma68]

I've just posted a listing in the Classifieds section for a small-size U.S. Navy peacoat from WWII. It may be NOS

http://www.thefedoralounge.com/threads/vintage-wwii-u-s-navy-peacoat-possibly-nos.90024/

 

[carabinier]

Hi all, new here but I followed this guide and I own a USN peacoat for 3years. It has kesey wool, double stitch cuff and corduroy pocket, but not the zigzag collar stitch and throat latch. This is a pic me wearing it in Swedish December chill. The waistline is quite pronounced, not unlike a old school English suit.
.

 

[Peacoat]

Looks like a good fit. Wear a sweater under it, and you will be good to go, even in Sweden. Welcome to the Forum.

 

[Worf]

Better Pics of my '49 Kersey Woolie...

Worf

 

[Trenchfriend]

Wonderful, loungers, wonderful!!

 

[Peacoat]

Excellent fit and an excellent coat. Do you have horses up there in the Capital District?