Past Lives and Einstein's Theory of Spooky Science at a Distance...

[Lean'n'mean]

The "I" is always the first delusion..

I think therefore I am.

 

[Lean'n'mean]

Huh.....?????

Onto/unto ?

 

[LizzieMaine]

"I yam what I yam an' 'ats all that I yam."

 

[philosophygirl78]

perhaps it is the principle of 'eternal recurrence' that allows us a glimpse into what Is...

 

[2jakes]

^^^^
Es ist...was es ist.

 

[Lean'n'mean]

aber wie es zu beweisen ?

 

[philosophygirl78]

aber wie es zu beweisen ?

Proof only ever exists in 'the now'. Change, is the only Constant we can know...

 

[philosophygirl78]

^^^^
Es ist...was es ist.

Except when it isn't.

 

[2jakes]

Proof only ever exists in 'the now'. Change, is the only Constant we can know...

“Der Weg nach oben und nach unten sind ein und dasselbe."
Heraclitus

 

[philosophygirl78]

“Der Weg nach oben und nach unten sind ein und dasselbe."
Heraclitus

yes..... time can only move in one direction.

“Der Weg nach oben und nach unten sind ein und dasselbe."
Heraclitus

yes... and there can be an infinite number of ups and downs at the same moment. one which can apparently affect the other with the new recent findings of proving 'spooky science' real...

 

[2jakes]

yes..... time can only move in one direction.


yes... and there can be an infinite number of ups and downs at the same moment. one which can apparently affect the other with the new recent findings of proving 'spooky science' real...

Sie meine Antwort zweimal zitiert , aber das für 2jakes angemessen ist!


Years ago, I recall a class in philosophy & the question with regards on
how to prove we exist.

I developed a headache thinking about it !


Edit: I finally found the answer:

LizzieMaine replied to me & considers me a friend ,
at least on this forum I exist !

 

[2jakes]

Edit: I finally found the answer:

LizzieMaine replied to me & considers me a friend ,
at least on this forum !

^^^^^
But ....what if LizzieMaine is not a human...but only a computerized entity to
promote responses by the rest of us common folks.

It’s a scary thought...!

 

[philosophygirl78]

Sie meine Antwort zweimal zitiert , aber das für 2jakes angemessen ist!

^^^^^
But ....what if LizzieMaine is not a human...but only a computerized entity to
promote responses by the rest of us common folks.

It’s a scary thought..

Why would it matter what she is? the difference between her being human or a computer would hold no bearing on the premise you are using to justify you exist. What it would mean is that you are utilizing outside forces from a 'thing' to prove existence... Thats a big no no... a cow doesn't moo because the sun rises... If B, then A.... uh uh..

 

[philosophygirl78]

^^^^^
But ....what if LizzieMaine is not a human...but only a computerized entity to
promote responses by the rest of us common folks.

It’s a scary thought...!

Why would it matter what she is? the difference between her being human or a computer would hold no bearing on the premise you are using to justify you exist. What it would mean is that you are utilizing outside forces from a 'thing' to prove existence... Thats a big no no... a cow doesn't moo because the sun rises... If B, then A.... uh uh..

 

[2jakes]

^^^
I got your reply the first time, no need to repeat !

Sorry to give the impression that I need LM, whether she is
human or otherwise to determine or justify my existence.

It was said in jest !

But , it is interesting what you replied.
Not sure if this is the place , but would like to hear what you consider
a “yes-yes” as oppose to my “no-no” .

 

[philosophygirl78]

^^^
I got your reply the first time, no need to repeat !

sorry... still learning how this forum works... its only my third day.

 

[2jakes]

sorry... still learning how this forum works... its only my third day.

Welcome aboard !
And please read my previous reply, Thanks

 

[philosophygirl78]

^^^
I got your reply the first time, no need to repeat !

Sorry to give the impression that I need LM, whether she is
human or otherwise to determine or justify my existence.

It was said in jest !

But , it is interesting what you replied.
Not sure if this is the place , but would like to hear what you consider
a “yes-yes” as oppose to my “no-no” .

What do you mean by 'yes-yes' 'no-no'? Are you referring to properly using deductive logic?

 

[philosophygirl78]

Welcome aboard !
And please read my previous reply, Thanks

I just did.

 

[2jakes]

What do you mean by 'yes-yes' 'no-no'? Are you referring to properly using deductive logic?

I was referring to this:

“...you are utilizing outside forces from a ‘thing’ to prove existence...That’s a big no no...
a cow doesn’t moo because the sun rises... If B, then A.. uh uh..” (philosophygirl78)

You pointed out what it’s not....
I like to hear more of "what is."

But, again, not sure if this is the place to elaborate .
Cheers !