nick123
I'll Lock Up
- Messages
- 6,370
- Location
- California
I was going to say, the customer's choice of jacket shouldn't be disrupted by the dynamics of the company he or she chooses to purchase from. The customer shouldn't have to be put in a spot where he or she faces a moral dilemna of what to buy. But then I compared it to purchasing from a company that (say employs sweat shop labor-steals patterns), and it suddenly becomes somewhat unethical. If the customer opts to view it that way. The customer shouldn't have to be cornered into what to buy or not-that right has to be honored, as he or she deserves the right to buy a product simply based on the products and not the curcumstances behind it. But many will see it as a moral choice to choose to support a company proven to be rooted in unethical practices or not. It really depends on how the customer views it, and the customer is entitled to spend their money how they choose. It's like buying a pair of Nikes. A moral choice if the customer sees it that way.
Last edited: