Rick Blaine
My Mail is Forwarded Here
- Messages
- 3,958
- Location
- Saskatoon, SK CANADA
Thanks I agree.Lovely, its great to have meaning full jewelry. Jewelry with real value.
This is the only ring I wear apart from my wedding band.
I purchased it at the Santa Fe flea market 20years ago.
Unless of course that is the idea.....Just as a PS.: A Brit may feel entitled to wear the image of King George VI but he should rather avoid a coin which states "IND IMP" for fear of making a political/colonial statement
I agree with you there, I think something like a graduation ring, or a ring for some fraternal lodge makes more sense, it ought not to be just a fashion accessory, it should be more meaningful.I just wear a promise ring which eventually will be replaced by a wedding ring.
When it comes to men and rings, I think they should only be worn as a symbol, a representation of something rather than just an accessory.
I've always thought a signet ring would be cool, alas I don't think my family has a coat of arms.
Assumption of arms without being granted said right from the Crown is still illegal.Make one up. Nobody can stop you, and it's as much use these days.
Initials in a monogram were also a common option.
Assumption of arms without being granted said right from the Crown is still illegal.
It may not be enforced, but it is still illegal.
In theory possibly, but much like the Treason Act, I highly doubt that would in any way stand up under Article 10 scrutiny.
I occasionally wear this ring that was a family estate consignment purchase from a local shop. The original owner (who passed) had it custom made. It is an oval bloodstone with a small center diamond in a 14k yellow gold ring.
I get many compliments from women who frequently turn to their husband and ask why he doesn't have enough confidence wear something like this.
Hutch
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk