Observe
One Too Many
- Messages
- 1,208
Could be Al's. It has the mouton around the cuff on the sleeve similar to a Cal but the belt loop snaps are top over bottom, instead of bottom over top like Cal.My mistake! Any ID on the maker?
Could be Al's. It has the mouton around the cuff on the sleeve similar to a Cal but the belt loop snaps are top over bottom, instead of bottom over top like Cal.My mistake! Any ID on the maker?
Out of curiosity, what indicators that tell you?Nice jacket but not a Cal.
It is an Al's.Could be Al's. It has the mouton around the cuff on the sleeve similar to a Cal but the belt loop snaps are top over bottom, instead of bottom over top like Cal.
The waist isn't the issue. It's the chest.The 613US also does not work for me. For me, it is the waist. I have a size 36 1928H that was a right tight fit for me but I was barely able to zip a size 38 613US (or the limited Rosie I can't remember which). It reminds me of the Levi's 70505 old pattern, the extra long sleeves and tiny waist. A pattern that some people like me has to wear a certain way like for example the 70505- roll the sleeves and leave the bottom one undone and only do up the 3rd and 4th buttons. Then I tried a size 36 641 and it looks huge. A fd who is thinner and shorter than me looks quite alright in his size 36 613 Rosie though.
Is it an Al’s or what’s your guess? It’ll have YKK zips too then…plus you’ll see extra stitches forming a triangle making line underneath the collar out at the tips…(sorry for the bad description)…Nice jacket but not a Cal.
Are you referring to this?Is it an Al’s or what’s your guess? It’ll have YKK zips too then…plus you’ll see extra stitches forming a triangle making line underneath the collar out at the tips…(sorry for the bad description)…
No the seam out at the tips of the collar (under)
I agree, those jackets do not look good on you. Mainly because of sleeve / body length.The patterns still are too long and too skinny in the chest. They look atrocious on me especially.
I do some lifting myself but I don't have any problems with their modern 613 pattern. Except for the hem which is slightly wide on me but that's not a Schott problem, that's me being out of proportion. I need a size 42 or sometimes even 44 for my chest but for the hem I could wear a 38 or 40. Which is also the reason why a jacket like the Mulholland doesn't work for me.I've seen tall and skinny guys that look good in Schott jackets, but I lift too much to fit in one and I'm too short.
That said, even if it had fit, the price, leather, and construction quality would keep me away.
Poor stitching quality especially.
I always find issues with construction on Schotts I handle. It's not just low stitch count. I know the difference.I agree, those jackets do not look good on you. Mainly because of sleeve / body length.
I do some lifting myself but I don't have any problems with their modern 613 pattern. Except for the hem which is slightly wide on me but that's not a Schott problem, that's me being out of proportion. I need a size 42 or sometimes even 44 for my chest but for the hem I could wear a 38 or 40. Which is also the reason why a jacket like the Mulholland doesn't work for me.
Here's a 613 one star
View attachment 537757 View attachment 537758 View attachment 537759 View attachment 537760
I've owned half a dozen new Perfecto's and I really can't say they had bad construction quality. Not at all. They don't have high stitch count but that doesn't equal bad construction quality.
Here's a horsehide 618 and a horsehide 613, perfectly neat stitching.
View attachment 537761 View attachment 537762
View attachment 537763 View attachment 537764 View attachment 537765
I bought the above brown / burgundy 613SJH a couple of months ago. Absolutely nothing wrong with its construction quality. Of course it's not 'Field Leathers perfect' but that's not what Schott is about.
Did I somehow manage to only buy good ones?
I love that 613SJHI agree, those jackets do not look good on you. Mainly because of sleeve / body length.
I do some lifting myself but I don't have any problems with their modern 613 pattern. Except for the hem which is slightly wide on me but that's not a Schott problem, that's me being out of proportion. I need a size 42 or sometimes even 44 for my chest but for the hem I could wear a 38 or 40. Which is also the reason why a jacket like the Mulholland doesn't work for me.
Here's a 613 one star
View attachment 537757 View attachment 537758 View attachment 537759 View attachment 537760
I've owned half a dozen new Perfecto's and I really can't say they had bad construction quality. Not at all. They don't have high stitch count but that doesn't equal bad construction quality.
Here's a horsehide 618 and a horsehide 613, perfectly neat stitching.
View attachment 537761 View attachment 537762
View attachment 537763 View attachment 537764 View attachment 537765
I bought the above brown / burgundy 613SJH a couple of months ago. Absolutely nothing wrong with its construction quality. Of course it's not 'Field Leathers perfect' but that's not what Schott is about.
Did I somehow manage to only buy good ones?
I always find issues with construction on Schotts I handle. It's not just low stitch count. I know the difference.
My proportions are even more extreme than yours if I remember correctly. And I'm not even the most extreme.
Like I said, I've seen Schott jackets fit tall, skinny people well, but that's it.
Personally, I don't think you're out of proportion at all. The actual problem is brands thinking that everyone is overweight and has little to no drop from chest to waist. This is of course far from only a Schott issue. This is also why I can no longer wear a Mulholland. They used to fit me when I was unhealthy, but now they look ridiculous on me as that 613 looks bad on you thanks to the hem.
I've got photos of poor Schott qc on my phone from when I went to the LA store, but this thread isn't about me not liking Schott and you defending them. I just haven't had great experiences. I'll keep trying though.