ShoreRoadLady
Practically Family
- Messages
- 742
Paisley said:There's nothing wrong with being focused on the bottom line. But I think companies make a mistake when they emphasize service, and then skimp on payroll. Yes, you might get 100 resumes for a job listing; that doesn't mean you can replace one somebody with another somebody.
Too true. Ultimately, treating your employees badly will affect your bottom line for the worse; therefore, it's in your best interest to treat them appropriately. Too few companies realize this.
I'm not terribly well versed on the Depression era; I wonder what the employer-employee relationship was like when there were so many people desperately seeking jobs? Were employers as employee-oriented as they were during the 1920s, or were they more likely to toss someone out in favor of a cheaper employee? (I suspect the answers are "No" and "Yes", going by economics, but it would be interesting to know details.) I know in one of the books I've been reading (1947-49, IIRC), a character mentions that another character can't afford to skimp on pay and expect candidates to still come beating down her door, that times were different.