Bfd70
I'll Lock Up
- Messages
- 4,335
- Location
- Traverse city
Welcome to TO TFL. Inflaming ocd since 2005
My mistake, this J106/Ridley's back is actually 25.5".
Do the same length guidelines apply to cross-zip half-belts? I have a size 36 Hooch Hauler size 36, spec'd with a 25" back, now I'm wondering if I should shorten it.
My hooch hauler is 23.25" back, but I'm 5"8.My mistake, this J106/Ridley's back is actually 25.5".
Do the same length guidelines apply to cross-zip half-belts? I have a size 36 Hooch Hauler size 36, spec'd with a 25" back, now I'm wondering if I should shorten it.
My mistake, this J106/Ridley's back is actually 25.5".
Do the same length guidelines apply to cross-zip half-belts? I have a size 36 Hooch Hauler size 36, spec'd with a 25" back, now I'm wondering if I should shorten it.
The stock hem width is notoriously tight for the hooch hauler, I could not zip up the jacket if it was a few cm longer.I would want it shorter than that and I’m a size 40, 182 cm long.
If it’s long enough to extend over your hips/ass the hem might be too tight!
Definitely not; half-belts whether single or double breasted will run longer.
Thank you both - I can easily recognize a great fit on someone else, like, Tartuwolf’s HH, just about anything Marc or Mr Proper share, but I never broke down which elements contributed to the fit - I it seems like the shorter length on a Perfecto style cross-zip facilitates the V shape, but where the longer half-belt gets a slight flair at the hem - is that the general distinction?My hooch hauler is 23.25" back, but I'm 5"8.
Id go for 23.5" given he chance now, slightly wider hem too.
If we talk strictly about shapes below the armpits then in my head there are several main variations:Thank you both - I can easily recognize a great fit on someone else, like, Tartuwolf’s HH, just about anything Marc or Mr Proper share, but I never broke down which elements contributed to the fit - I it seems like the shorter length on a Perfecto style cross-zip facilitates the V shape, but where the longer half-belt gets a slight flair at the hem - is that the general distinction?
Which one of those is for a dad bod?If we talk strictly about shapes below the armpits then in my head there are several main variations:
V - gradually tapers from armpits to bottom hem. Great for short jackets. Also great when your waist is wider than your hips.
Y - tapers from pits to waist and then goes straight down. My favorite one. Again works best with shorter jackets. Very nice if your waist is the same or slimmer than your hips (like my case).
| | - tube or almost no taper. SB is famous for this I guess. Works well for more blocky body types. Also great for long jackets or coats.
( ) - barel shaped. The ribbed hem jackets tend to have this shape often. Great for folks with extra real estate in the middle part of the torso.
)( - hourglass shaped. This works for longer jackets or coats very well. For example coats with a belt. Or longer half-belts. Again, your waist needs to be slimmer than your hips and you have to have some upper body mass for this to work best. Looks best if the flare out at the bottom is rather subtle, not extreme.
Also adjusters at the waist (like half-belt) work better for folks with a waist that is the same or slimmer than hips. Adjusters near the bottom hem work better for folks with hips slimmer than the waist.
Which one of those is for a dad bod?
I'd say the most sensible/comfortable would be the () shape, but it wouldn't be the most flattering. Overall I think "dad bod" really goes well with ribbed jackets like an A2.Which one of those is for a dad bod?