there's a similar modern pair here:
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/351010026738?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649
p.s. what's wrong with the ones in the photo you posted ?
please do !
(apologies for not giving credit for the above scan. there are so many images going around on tumblr it's impossible to know where they originated)
true. the CC41 "Venty Cumf" cap which i bought from Baron Kurtz - and is pictured somewhere in this thread - has full satin liner to the edges of the band.
i think those are flared, but they also look about 12" - 13" wide at the bottom.
that's really my point... that the 11" bottom trousers in those ads wouldn't look as wide or as flared (if at all flared) in real life.
here's me in a pair of US 1936 trousers that have 11.5" (23") bottoms and also 11.5" knee.
a curious thing is that a trouser that has no taper at all - i.e. is straight from knee to bottom - can look flared from certain angles:
...they still don't look as flared as most of the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.