jlee562
I'll Lock Up
- Messages
- 5,104
- Location
- San Francisco, CA
jlee562, I totally get what you're saying; the blogosphere has become a necessary facet of supplemental news information.
On the other hand, a blog is nothing more than an editorial. John Doe is not representing The Cedar Rapids Gazette, he's representing himself and his blog Doe-Ra-Me (totally made up, but clever blog name - you can PM me for a checks-payable address). Yes, he must show some kind of constraint and professionalism if he hopes to do well by his readers, but at the end of the day, and in a sea of disinterested internet people, he only answers to himself.
Let's put it this way; what does The Dish blog mean? What does it stand for? What impact does it have on the D.C. community? Does it employ 500 people? Does it reside in a marble and granite building that folks can walk by on their way to lunch? If the presses stopped tomorrow and demolition were to commence, would people fondly remember it?
I'm not trying to create a straw man by drawing comparisons, and neither am I saying that blogs aren't imporant because they're not located in a fancy downtown building. Yet, consider how important The Columbus Dispatch is to that community, as opposed to how unimportant some guy on the internet is to the same audience. If TCD fails in its reporting, or slants its news, or fires its editors, people take notice. It's a tangible, visible thing that sticks in a community's mind. The Dish? Huh? The what? Until this thread, I'd never even heard of it.
So what makes a worthy news outlet? I think a tie to the community, a physical location, staff with differing opinions and perspectives, integrity, objective and unbiased reporting, ethics and standards, a thirst for real reporting, the ability to run an article no matter the controversy so long as the facts are reported. And there are so many more to add to that list, but you get my drift.
Journalism died for me in the 1970s when Gannett swept through the country buying up local papers and broadcasters. There is no longer a civic duty to report news, there is merely a duty to maintain profits at any cost.
You're right to point out that blogs aren't a substitute for local news. At least none of the ones I've seen. They may exist out there, but to be honest, I'm not a huge blog reader.
I do think though, that blogs are more than editorials. If we look at Sullivan's again (only because it's the one I'm most familiar with), his blog was an exceptional source of information on the 2009 election protests in Iran, as well as the Libyan uprising. Both were events that, as someone who studies international relations and is familiar with the tenets of journalism (my thesis adviser was a foreign bureau chief for the LA Times), were not covered very well by western media outlets. For someone like me who takes an interest in those kinds of topics, what The Dish did was to relay first person accounts vis-a-vis social media (which is another "like or not" facet of the world), first hand accounts from bloggers in those respective countries, analysis from commentators of both sides of the political spectrum, and the reaction(s) of the international community.
I would tend to agree with the idea that pre-internet journalism was qualitatively superior, but there's that old expression, sometimes you can't go home. Pandora's box is already opened, and as such, I'm totally alright with blogs filling some of the void.