Edward
Bartender
- Messages
- 25,082
- Location
- London, UK
We had a concert a few years back featuring a band that included a shofar -- an instrument of Jewish religious significance -- and the band member who played it took a moment to explain that significance to the audience. One member of the audience yelled an anti-Semitic comment in response.
I threw that person out.
Was I intolerant?
We had another concert featuring an opening act made up of two young women. A young man in the audience shouted out a suggestion that these young women should perform a certain act upon a part of his person.
I threw him out.
Was I intolerant?
My point entirely.
I think the biggest structural problem with the internet is that it gives people with no control of their impulses -- or their mouths -- an outlet with no checks on it at all. It's one thing when Roy The Neighborhood Racist Asshole is popping off down at the corner bar, but when persons of global prominence are randomly free-associating every incoherent thought that comes out of their head on Twitter, it does tend to shade the discourse.
There was a time when the commercial media would eventually find someone too 'much' for them - even nowadays it still happens. The problem is that nowadays once they've become that notorious that no commercial channel will touch them, they can still spew hatred via the web. I think the time is fast coming when the usual platitudes won't wash any longer and online service providers will be expected to take more responsibility for the content they host. Personally, I think that if they're making money by offering the platform, then they do owe a public duty to shoulder some responsibility for what they are complicit in making available.