Doctor Strange
I'll Lock Up
- Messages
- 5,253
- Location
- Hudson Valley, NY
No, it takes place in NYC. I personally doubt this is an early example of product placement. More likely it was just an actual newspaper.
Have not seen "Executive Suite" but your
question got me thinking.
John Wanamaker Department Store was the first department store in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and one of the first department stores in the United States.
Does the movie take place in Philadelphia
or is one of the characters from there?
No, it takes place in NYC. I personally doubt this is an early example of product placement. More likely it was just an actual newspaper.
No, it takes place in NYC. I personally doubt this is an early example of product placement. More likely it was just an actual newspaper.
So is the consensus advertisement or happenstance?
Jack Black does that, and startles me every time I see him. You think he's just going to play a stocky doofus, and then . . . somehow, his character winds up being recognizably (rather than just comically) human. See his musician/teacher in School of Rock and his Carl Denham in the 2005 King Kong. I haven't seen him in much, but those two performances surprised me.Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle. We laughed a lot. Group consensus: Jack Black steals the movie.
Based on my experience in the studios, not much is left to chance.
A scene takes time and the daily rushes are gone over to see the results
or what needs to be worked on. One of the technicians is assigned the task
of making a recording with notes and photos of the set. If, for example, a
cigarette is in the scene, he has to make sure that it is about the same length
for continuity.
A scene can sometimes take all morning.
Another technician will have a tank on his back with smoke, I’m not sure what kind
of smoke was used, but before shooting, he would spray the set with it,
creating a specific mood for the cameras.
You once asked me about the movie with Audrey Hepburn when they were
shooting in New York in the early morning.
I believe I made reference that they never go with available light.
The umbrellas and lights they use is what they depend on.
Ever noticed film noir scenes at night, especially the streets or pavements
which mostly look as if it has rained?
That’s made possible by a water truck!
Imagine the frustrations Howard Hughes must’ve had in trying to find
the right clouds for his epic film, “Hell’s Angels” (1930)
Not so sure about 1954 when this movie was made.
I'm sure Lizzie can provide some color around "Not so sure about 1954 when this movie was made," but I know movies were doing product placement with a lot of thought and contractual agreement at least as far back as the '30s. Hence, I just find it hard to believe that a giant Wanamaker ad was highly visible - basically framed - in a scene for several seconds by accident.
Shall I light up the LizzieMaine signal?
Jack Black does that, and startles me every time I see him. You think he's just going to play a stocky doofus, and then . . . somehow, his character winds up being recognizably (rather than just comically) human. See his musician/teacher in School of Rock and his Carl Denham in the 2005 King Kong. I haven't seen him in much, but those two performances surprised me.
My best guess on the Wanamakers ad is that there would have been little point for Wanamakers to spend the money for product placement in a movie that would play all over the world when their primary clientele was regional. So yeah, I think it was most likely what was on the back page of whichever paper it was for that day.
Given that the film is "Executive Suite," and it's about Executives, the paper is almost certainly the Herald Tribune, the nice, safe, bourgeois Republican choice for the executive who wants to seem thoughtful, but not a prissy intellectual. A proper executive wouldn't be caught dead reading a Hearst sheet, the World-Telegram and the Post were too pink, they'd be thought eggheads for reading the Times, and even though they all read the Daily News on the sly, if they were caught with it they'd claim they found it on the subway.
I don't know what they've used throughout the history of filmmaking, but in the late-80s to early-90s those tanks were partially filled with oil that was heated just enough to produce that smoke. In Oliver Stone's 1991 movie The Doors they used the Olympic Auditorium in Los Angeles for the "Miami concert" scenes, and for four days straight they filled the place with that oil smoke, both for general atmosphere and to give the impression that the "audience" was smoking during the show. Of course, fire and health ordinances being what they are, they wouldn't let us actually smoke inside the building unless it was necessary for one of the actors to do so for the shot....Another technician will have a tank on his back with smoke, I’m not sure what kind of smoke was used, but before shooting, he would spray the set with it, creating a specific mood for the cameras...
My best guess on the Wanamakers ad is that there would have been little point for Wanamakers to spend the money for product placement in a movie that would play all over the world when their primary clientele was regional. So yeah, I think it was most likely what was on the back page of whichever paper it was for that day.
Given that the film is "Executive Suite," and it's about Executives, the paper is almost certainly the Herald Tribune, the nice, safe, bourgeois Republican choice for the executive who wants to seem thoughtful, but not a prissy intellectual. A proper executive wouldn't be caught dead reading a Hearst sheet, the World-Telegram and the Post were too pink, they'd be thought eggheads for reading the Times, and even though they all read the Daily News on the sly, if they were caught with it they'd claim they found it on the subway.