Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Vintage Streetstyle Thread

Lauren

Distinguished Service Award
Messages
5,060
Location
Sunny California
Miss_Bella_Hell said:
Did that last gal forget her bottoms? lol
I see so many gals walking around downtown like that... it makes me wonder if they've forgotten clothes under their jackets? lol I must be quite old fashioned... it's rather shocking.
 

sixsexsix

Practically Family
Messages
870
Location
toronto
kamikat said:
My hatred of 80's fashion is why I don't like 40s fashion. Unless you wear 40s fashion with 40s heels, hair, the whole look, it quickly turns into 80s fashion.

Feel the same way
 

sixsexsix

Practically Family
Messages
870
Location
toronto
Also I'm sure the girl who looks like she is wearing no pants is actually wearing shorts with tights underneath, popular style right now.
 

KittyT

I'll Lock Up
Messages
4,463
Location
Boston, MA
kamikat said:
I don't think it's "purist" in my case. In my eye, so many of the "streetstyle" pics look like the worst of the 80s. High Fashion keeps trying to shove 80s fashion down our throats. It might look cool to younger people, but to anyone old enough to have worn it the first time around, it's awful. My hatred of 80's fashion is why I don't like 40s fashion. Unless you wear 40s fashion with 40s heels, hair, the whole look, it quickly turns into 80s fashion.

THAT'S what it is! I couldn't place my finger on it. Most of them look like the indie kids I see walking around that place together everything in such a way that it looks like the worst of the worst of the 80s.
 

Lily Powers

Practically Family
kamikat said:
I don't think it's "purist" in my case. In my eye, so many of the "streetstyle" pics look like the worst of the 80s. High Fashion keeps trying to shove 80s fashion down our throats. It might look cool to younger people, but to anyone old enough to have worn it the first time around, it's awful. My hatred of 80's fashion is why I don't like 40s fashion. Unless you wear 40s fashion with 40s heels, hair, the whole look, it quickly turns into 80s fashion.
That describes it perfectly! I'm frequently disappointed to look at a "vintage" garment, supposedly from the "1940's/1950's" when to my eye, it's clearly a 1980's garment. I wonder if women in the 1930's thought that fashion from the 1860's was collectible? And if they think that the fascination some of us have with the Art Deco jewelry and clothing of their time is as silly as many of us think 1980's revival fashion is now.
 

Esme

One of the Regulars
Messages
169
Location
Eugene, Oregon
LOL at Paisley!

I think some is just that it is street photography. They are not models, not all stick thin and with clothes either made or fitted to them and street angles, lighting, makeup, etc. People can look soooo different in still photos than walking, moving around, etc. I look godawful in most photos but I don't think I look anywhere near that bad in real life!
Anyway, I like these interpretations. That is the way I wear vintage. Touches here and there. Sometimes with vintage-y hair and makeup and sometimes with modern hair and makeup. Sometimes vintage accessories and modern clothes and sometimes just one vintage piece. I like to mix it up and I don't (currently) do any type of re-creation or living history stuff, so why deny today? Not that I don't have complete respect and admiration for those who can pull it off completely, but with limitations of being handicapped (can't wear heels, often use a cane, etc) AND being plus size AND being over 50 (don't want to look like I forgot what year it was!) I like to make nods to today, also.
 

Laura Chase

One Too Many
Messages
1,354
Location
Copenhagen, Denmark
Simply cannot get this lovely girl out of my head, I thought she deserved to be posted again. ;)

080929-adele-at-dior-paris-jardin-des-tuileries-1.jpg


080929-adele-at-dior-paris-jardin-des-tuileries-3.jpg
 

volatile

A-List Customer
Messages
421
Location
London, England
2209RLcapWeb.jpg


This guy was on Sartorialist recently... and it's inspired me to go grab some Packer boots. I love this take on vintage style; I know it's not to the taste of a few here, but I just think this guy's outfit works.
 

Paisley

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,439
Location
Indianapolis
Esme said:
I think some is just that it is street photography. They are not models, not all stick thin and with clothes either made or fitted to them and street angles, lighting, makeup, etc. People can look soooo different in still photos than walking, moving around, etc. I look godawful in most photos but I don't think I look anywhere near that bad in real life!

As a former professional photographer, I respectfully disagree. The photographers have used good portrait lighting (the shadows are soft) and have shot at a low angle so that the feet don't look like they're 2" long. It's mostly the clothes.

Take the red, white and black outfit, for instance. The scarf makes the lady look like she doesn't have a neck. The skirt hits her at a wide part of her calf. The socks thicken her ankles and the white stockings make her legs stand out and look big. The overall result is that she looks thicker than she probably is. With a few changes, the outfit would look much better on her.
 

cherry lips

Call Me a Cab
Messages
2,949
Location
sweden
I thought the blonde in red, white, and black was dreamy. To me, looking thin does not equal looking beautiful. Style is much more important.
 

Laura Chase

One Too Many
Messages
1,354
Location
Copenhagen, Denmark
I agree with cherry lips, essentially.

To me, the criterium for a successful outfit isn't that it's flattering. Rather, I want an outfit to be interesting and stylish. Because, what is "flattering"? In connection to this, where does the 20's silhouette stand? Would you call that "unflattering" and frumpy?
 

kamikat

Call Me a Cab
Messages
2,794
Location
Maryland
Laura Chase said:
In connection to this, where does the 20's silhouette stand? Would you call that "unflattering" and frumpy?

In my opinion, what is flattering varies from figure to figure. The 20's silhouette can be very flattering to a certain figure type but not EVERY figure type. This goes for just about every era's silhouette. The joy of wearing vintage today is that we get to pick what works for our figures.
 

Laura Chase

One Too Many
Messages
1,354
Location
Copenhagen, Denmark
kamikat said:
In my opinion, what is flattering varies from figure to figure. The 20's silhouette can be very flattering to a certain figure type but not EVERY figure type. This goes for just about every era's silhouette. The joy of wearing vintage today is that we get to pick what works for our figures.

I have to ask: Does it have to be flattering for our figure? And if so, why? ;) :)

But I understand this is off topic, so just ignore me - I just wanted to point out that not everyone strives for the typical kind of attractiveness or beauty or whatever it is that the word "flattering" means. Maybe a certain outfit doesn't suit my figure, according whichever standard we are judging this by, but I might love it and might find it 100% in congruence with my person.
 

Paisley

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,439
Location
Indianapolis
Laura Chase said:
I agree with cherry lips, essentially.

To me, the criterium for a successful outfit isn't that it's flattering. Rather, I want an outfit to be interesting and stylish. Because, what is "flattering"? In connection to this, where does the 20's silhouette stand? Would you call that "unflattering" and frumpy?

That's the challenge--an outfit that is interesting and stylish, and flattering. I love 40s and 50s looks, but they don't fit me. Mostly, I wear vintage inspired clothes; I find they look good and make me look and feel good as well. :)
 

Laura Chase

One Too Many
Messages
1,354
Location
Copenhagen, Denmark
Paisley said:
That's the challenge--an outfit that is interesting and stylish, and flattering. I love 40s and 50s looks, but they don't fit me. Mostly, I wear vintage inspired clothes; I find they look good and make me look and feel good as well. :)

I believe that the young girls today are really throwing flattering out the window - it's all about interesting. Maybe flattering becomes more important as you get older, I don't know, it seems like the younger trends often, whichever time you are looking at, are quite unflattering. Oh well, enough about that. :)

I thought this girl looked sweet and her coat is beautiful, and love how her stockings match:
3366536588_051d602b7b_o.jpg


We've seen her before, it's piksi from flickr:
20080828_02.jpg


I thought she looked very elegant and comfortable, in a kind of Hepburn-ish way, also because she has such a tiny stature:
20080802_02.jpg


We've also seen her before, va va voom vampy:
20080529_01.jpg
 

kamikat

Call Me a Cab
Messages
2,794
Location
Maryland
Laura Chase said:
I have to ask: Does it have to be flattering for our figure? And if so, why? ;) :)

But I understand this is off topic, so just ignore me - I just wanted to point out that not everyone strives for the typical kind of attractiveness or beauty or whatever it is that the word "flattering" means. Maybe a certain outfit doesn't suit my figure, according whichever standard we are judging this by, but I might love it and might find it 100% in congruence with my person.

It depends on the personality of the wearer. If the person is confident and comfortable in their own skin, they probably don't care if something is flattering. On the other hand, someone who feels uncomfortable about carrying extra weight or big feet, or whatever, might care more about minimizing the thing that she's uncomfortable with.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
109,097
Messages
3,074,075
Members
54,091
Latest member
toptvsspala
Top