Feraud said:What is the best way to pin down when the cross over happened?
Would it be to compare various labels with the suit styles to narrow down the decade?
Feraud said:What is the best way to pin down when the cross over happened?
Would it be to compare various labels with the suit styles to narrow down the decade?
You can say that again. Always been confusing to me. :eusa_doh: There is also the possibility that older labels were used on somewhat newer clothes as the labels were cut off of a roll as needed. I'm sure garment factories would not throw away an outdated roll of tags to stay current, but they would continue using the older ones until they ran out, further adding to the confusion.Baron Kurtz said:It is incredibly difficult to find this stuff out.
bk
Would a stamped union label suffice?Baron Kurtz said:the only idea i've ever come up with is to take all the union labelled suits from the 1950s that also bear tailor's tags with a date. And see if, let's say, after 1955 all the union labels have black numbering, before 1955 they all have red numbering, and in 1955 it's transitional. Or whatever. It is incredibly difficult to find this stuff out.
So, i know that an overcoat i had - dated 1967 - had black numbers.
bk
Baron Kurtz said:the only idea i've ever come up with is to take all the union labelled suits from the 1950s that also bear tailor's tags with a date. And see if, let's say, after 1955 all the union labels have black numbering, before 1955 they all have red numbering, and in 1955 it's transitional. Or whatever. It is incredibly difficult to find this stuff out.
So, i know that an overcoat i had - dated 1967 - had black numbers.
bk