moustache
Practically Family
- Messages
- 863
- Location
- Vancouver,Wa
ShooShooBaby said:i live in a city where it's very, very easy to get around without a car. i bike almost everywhere i go, and take public transportation when i don't. i get very frustrated without my bike though - i can usually get places 15-30 min faster by bike than by bus/lightrail!
needless to say, i do a lot of walking, too.
and, uh, to tie this in with the golden era, i am fascinated by the amount of streetcar lines this city used to have. i can totally imagine where they went too, by the small bursts of storefronts here and there.
I agree with ShooShoobaby here.Portland has really developed a wonderful streetcar/lightrail line.If you live in Portland it is a delight.If you live north though,forget it.I live in Vancouver where a car is almost necessary as the cost is too high to get to Portland.It costs almost $5 to get to downtown Portland(one way).And since there is no lightrail all the way,part is by bus.It takes me 10 minutes by car vs 1 hour bus/train combo.
And even with gas at $3.25,it is still less expensive.And time is valuable.I don't want to spend part of it going through bad parts of town either.
The drawback here also is that so many millions have been spent on rail systems that nothing has been done with existing roads and repair.or widening.Thats a conundrum as the buses use the roads lol
So pedestrian America is a delight in big cities but elsewhere,i will use my car.
Europe has done so well with public transportation.It is easier to do with each country only having to look after 10 to 30 million people.We have a very large country with over 300 million now.Just not easy to do.
Whew.Ok.I'm done.
JD