Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

The Bowler or Derby Hat

Good luck with that. Having been run off my bike 5 times in London traffic (all but 1 time, not my fault) I would never breath near a bike without a good quality modern helmet. It's certainly saved my life at least once.

I'm also a keen cyclist and they are the original riding safety helmet. It's the only kind of safety helmet I would ever consider wearing on a bike - otherwise I stick to flat caps.
 

Seb Lucas

I'll Lock Up
Messages
7,562
Location
Australia
Good luck with that. Having been run off my bike 5 times in London traffic (all but 1 time, not my fault) I would never breath near a bike without a good quality modern helmet. It's certainly saved my life at least once.

Well I've got to ask - why would anyone ride a bike in traffic? Everyone I know who does this has been "run over" at least once. A guy I knew was killed riding his bike on a main road last year. It all seems a bit nuts, with or without a bowler.
 

besdor

Vendor/Sponsor
Messages
1,727
Location
up north
Probably the worst place that I've seen anyone try to ride a bike in traffic was Naples Italy. The drivers are truly insane and everyone is cutting each other off. Now I know why I never drive in Europe!
 
When working as a cycle courier - as I was at the time - it's a bit of a necessity. And it's great exercise, and quicker than driving or taking public transport. At least in this city. So when I stopped the couriering I continue to ride in London. At least here the traffic is typically quite slow and so collisions typically relatively non-damaging. it's much worse in the country where these arseholes clip you at 65 mph … just ask benstephens.

The problem we have in this country is that there's basically nowhere you can ride where you're not in traffic. Had we a proper cycling infrastructure - like, let's say, Holland - where cyclists are entirely segregated from drivers, the situation would be much better than it is. But that would encourage people to ride bicycles, which - despite protestations to the contrary - is fundamentally anathema to the views of the political folks here (of any party, except the Greens) who don't want to do anything that would potentially reduce the consumption of petrolium and therefore endanger the donations they receive from this powerful lobby.


Well I've got to ask - why would anyone ride a bike in traffic? Everyone I know who does this has been "run over" at least once. A guy I knew was killed riding his bike on a main road last year. It all seems a bit nuts, with or without a bowler.
 

Joshbru3

I'll Lock Up
Messages
4,409
Location
Chicago, IL
1890 - 1893 Baird & Levi Brown Derby

I received this one this weekend and it is spectacular! I love these old brown derbies. You might be wondering how I narrowed the dates of this derby down to about a 3 year span……well…….I did a bit of research last night. In the auction, the seller did not show a picture of the manufacture tag located under the sweatband, so I was very surprised to find one with a manufactures name, location, and size. I searched for the name of the company in EVERY issue of The American Hatter and The Clothier and Furnisher publications on google. I found a wealth of information.

The company was started around 1886 as Cochran, Baird & Levi in Bethel, Conn.

It changed names and ownership several times and I was able to find information about each incarnation of the company. Here is what I found:

The company names and dates were taken right from articles in The American Hatter and The Clothier and Furnisher.

Cochran, Baird & Levi : 1886 - 1889

Baird & Levi : 1890 - 1893

Leach, Baird & Wiley: 1894 - 1896

Baird-Untiedt & Penfield Co: 1897 - 1900

Baird-Untiedt Co: 1901 - 1918

Fairbury Hat Co (Operating the Former Baird-Untiedt Co): 1919

John H. Baird Hat Co - 1920 - ?




















 

Joshbru3

I'll Lock Up
Messages
4,409
Location
Chicago, IL
Very cool Derby, Josh! From what I've found, the United Hatters of North America didn't exist until 1896, from the merger of two separate unions. The Union label tells me it's 1896+, which I realize doesn't jibe with the information you found.

Brad

Thanks, Brad! I had thought about the union tag as well and tried to find some sort of info dating the tag to pre-1896. i was unable to find anything. The thing that has me baffled is that Leach, Baird & Wiley took ownership in 1894 of the company that was formally known as Baird & Levi due to change in partners and legal reasons. Would the new company still continue on using Baird & Levi tags in 1896+ even though they acquired the company several years earlier and changed names due to legal reasons?
 
Last edited:

Brad Bowers

I'll Lock Up
Messages
4,187
Thanks, Brad! I had thought about the union tag as well and tried to find some sort of info dating the tag to pre-1896. i was unable to find anything. The thing that has me baffled is that Leach, Baird & Wiley took ownership in 1894 of the company that was formally known as Baird & Levi due to change in partners and legal reasons. Would the new company still continue on using Baird & Levi tags in 1896+ even though they acquired the company several years earlier and changed names due to legal reasons?

I really don't know. I can't imagine they would continue using the old tags, unless we are talking Company versus Brand. Perhaps Baird & Levi was the brand, though under different ownership. The idea of branding wasn't as strong in the nineteenth century as it would become shortly after 1900, so maybe that doesn't make sense, either. I'm not sure what to make of it.

Brad
 

Joshbru3

I'll Lock Up
Messages
4,409
Location
Chicago, IL
I really don't know. I can't imagine they would continue using the old tags, unless we are talking Company versus Brand. Perhaps Baird & Levi was the brand, though under different ownership. The idea of branding wasn't as strong in the nineteenth century as it would become shortly after 1900, so maybe that doesn't make sense, either. I'm not sure what to make of it.

Brad

I just found this article from a 1901 American Federalist Journal. It does state the 1896 date, but also says:

"It may be well to state, however, that in 1885 both national organizations met through the agency of their respective boards of directors, and adopted a union label, calling it the label of The United Hatters of North America. Since that time and up to 1896 both organizations jointly paid all of the expenses of the label."


Unless i'm reading this wrong, it appears that the United Hatters of North America label has actually existed since 1885 and was supported by the two separate organizations. It wasn't until 1896 that the two separate organizations became one and ceased using their old organization names and from then on was solely known as the United Hatters of North America.





http://books.google.com/books?id=HZpHAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA79&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&sig=ACfU3U3NZcLWPtGLFk_bXaJpYGswurYVVA&ci=3%2C26%2C959%2C1453&edge=0
 

Brad Bowers

I'll Lock Up
Messages
4,187
Very cool! That settles the date of your Derby, but could throw the dating of other hats into disarray, since they could be earlier than we thought. Great work, Josh.

Brad
 

Huertecilla

Banned
Messages
347
Location
Mountains of southern Spain
Seems I 'need' to read every page of this thread TOO!

Was invited by The Hat Lady to spend the weekend at the coast for o.a. things a sunday lunch she had organised.
There would be some interesting guests coming if I was she said so I went.
Boy was she right.
I will not bore you guys brain dead and just mention the hat surprises.

The one was a stunningly positive reaction to my outfit and the ' demand' I show it sunday too which receieved cheers and applause.

That leads to the second surprise which was the guest who had been the owner/managing director of a large hat manufacturing company in Soho, London for many decades.
His wife was over the moon so happy as her husband came to life with sparkling eyes talking about the hat making.
Long and interesting stories short:
- He immediately poored out detailed info about the felt my hat was made of, which animals furs were blended in and how he finish was called.
- He had provided the four straight top indy hats and had the task to replicate them for the second movie. The enigma about the blocks getting lost had a simple basis answer too. I was flabbergasted about it all. Of me hearing it directly from thé guys mouth.
- Allthough he had in the end liquidated when the hat making business had collapsed* because of chinese imports, he had gone to rediculous lengths/cost to haul two machines over to his villa at the coast.
Lastly, upon saying goodby, he not only invited me for a diner and hat talk at his house but;'I still have an 1850s bowler with low top and you can have that.'


* very soon after ww2 womens' hats became the main stay, the bread and butter of his company despite military contracts. As time progresses daily wear by ladies disappeared but the death knell of it all came when the ladies did not dig into their purses anymore for weddings and parties but bought a cheaper chinese lookalike for the day.
This echos the stories I have been told over here: like Isesa would have disappeared alltogether is not for the main stay of jewish traditional hats.
 
Last edited:

ManofKent

My Mail is Forwarded Here
Messages
3,039
Location
United Kingdom
Josh - great little Derby, wonderful condition for it's age.

OfCourseMyHorse - nice find too. The GADunn on the sweat combined with the Dunn&Co label almost certainly puts it early to mid-50s
 

Forum statistics

Threads
109,329
Messages
3,078,992
Members
54,243
Latest member
seeldoger47
Top