They both look like pull overs to me. There were two shirts that I'm aware of that were made of aertex for tropical use. The pull over and the "Desert shirt". The later was pretty much like a belted bush jacket with out the belt..carter said:The battledress blouse on the left looks like a pullover. The one on the right appears to be full-buttoning.
Does anyone have any information on these?
Were they standard issue for North Africa and/or the tropics?
cookie said:Is that what these are or was the infamous Bombay bloomer blousier in the leg?
That's what I understand. Also, many of these Bombay Bloomers were cut down to shorts at some point after they were made.I was under the impression that Bombay Bloomers were convertable from trousers to shorts by buttoning up the legs, but i may be wrong. I'm no expert.
Baron Kurtz said:The guy on the left of the recent (colour) photos looks so much like Freddy Mercury.
Trotsky said:Must have been a dress function, Helicopter Units wore the Slouch hats as an optional dress item for officers or just private purchase. When they really wanted to dress to impress, the hat came out. From your description these guys belonged to an Air Evac Unit. Absolutely fascinating.
Edit: And the spurs, just noticed them.
*************************eightbore said:Given the below, what was the original shape of the campaign hat???
carter said:The battledress blouse on the left looks like a pullover. The one on the right appears to be full-buttoning.
Does anyone have any information on these?
Were they standard issue for North Africa and/or the tropics?
John in Covina said:*************************
There is a few pictures of the earlier campaign hat such as pix of the Spanish American War to give you an idea in on of the Hat threads about campaign hats. To me it looks a bit like the slouch hat but that may be an unfair comparison. The Montana peak style comes in after 1900 but before WWI and that crown was higher in the undented portion than the current DI style campaign hat.
Mojave Jack said:Happy to! Is it my size? Oh, wait, did you mean me?
Yorker, you said earlier your a size 8. Is that literal? Stratton makes up to a size 7-7/8, but they might stretch to an 8.
Mojave Jack said:Yorker, you said earlier your a size 8. Is that literal? Stratton makes up to a size 7-7/8, but they might stretch to an 8.
They do turn up on the 'bay fairly frequently. I bought a beater Stratton and messed around with it, but found that it had too much moth damage (and was a really bizarre forest green) to keep around. My experience was that it was incredibly stiff, but after I soaked it in denatured alcohol for about 2 days it softened up somewhat. The felt was also very thick. It is not a hat I'd ever think of wearing around here in the summer! The quality is definitely there, though. Bottom line, heavy and stiff, though probably about the way a campaign hat should be!Yorker said:It depends- naturally, on the brand. my head is around 24 3/4"-25" so it puts me between a 7 7/8ths and an 8 depending on the maker.
How is the felt on the Stratton hats? I saw someone on eBlag who had them in every size and head shape. The color is wrong (grey) but the price is cheap enough to buy to experiment with(~$40).
eightbore said:Given the below, what was the original shape of the campaign hat???
http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archiv...91239E733A25757C2A9679C946197D6CF&oref=slogin
[huh] [huh] [huh]