Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Stetson Sweat Stamps/ LOT XXXX

MikeinRome

One Too Many
Messages
1,010
Stetson Number 1 Quality, Lot Number 7656. Probably dates about 1939, give or take about a year.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240106_153322_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240106_153322_HDR.jpg
    3.1 MB · Views: 85
  • IMG_20240106_153400_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240106_153400_HDR.jpg
    2.8 MB · Views: 70
  • IMG_20240106_153910_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240106_153910_HDR.jpg
    2.9 MB · Views: 71
  • IMG_20240106_154054_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240106_154054_HDR.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 59

MikeinRome

One Too Many
Messages
1,010
Stetson Number 1 Quality, Looks like Lot Number 5584. Dates to 1920's.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240106_150939_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240106_150939_HDR.jpg
    3.5 MB · Views: 59
  • IMG_20240106_151510_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240106_151510_HDR.jpg
    3.3 MB · Views: 71
  • IMG_20240106_151612_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240106_151612_HDR.jpg
    2.2 MB · Views: 58
  • IMG_20240106_151658_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240106_151658_HDR.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 61
  • IMG_20240106_151045_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240106_151045_HDR.jpg
    2.8 MB · Views: 65

MikeinRome

One Too Many
Messages
1,010
Stetson Medalist straw. 2 3/4 inch brim. Lot Number 7634. Since first use of the term Stetson Medalist was in June 1938, this hat seems to date to a tight window of 1938 or 1939, 1940 at the very latest, I'm estimating.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240315_115445_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240315_115445_HDR.jpg
    4.4 MB · Views: 48
  • IMG_20240315_115551_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240315_115551_HDR.jpg
    3.5 MB · Views: 52
  • IMG_20240315_115621_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240315_115621_HDR.jpg
    3.2 MB · Views: 61
  • IMG_20240315_115650_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240315_115650_HDR.jpg
    4.8 MB · Views: 50
  • IMG_20240315_115836_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240315_115836_HDR.jpg
    3.5 MB · Views: 62
  • IMG_20240315_115912_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240315_115912_HDR.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 62
Last edited:

MikeinRome

One Too Many
Messages
1,010
Stetson Boss Raw Edge Kettle Finish Real Nutria. Lot Number 7434.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240307_111433_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240307_111433_HDR.jpg
    3.7 MB · Views: 58
  • IMG_20240307_111114_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240307_111114_HDR.jpg
    3.9 MB · Views: 60
  • IMG_20240307_111052_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240307_111052_HDR.jpg
    2.4 MB · Views: 48
  • IMG_20240307_110923_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240307_110923_HDR.jpg
    2.3 MB · Views: 47
  • IMG_20240307_111000_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240307_111000_HDR.jpg
    2.5 MB · Views: 48

MikeinRome

One Too Many
Messages
1,010
Stetson Real Nutria. Lot Number 7724.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240118_225101_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240118_225101_HDR.jpg
    4.3 MB · Views: 53
  • IMG_20240118_225142_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240118_225142_HDR.jpg
    2.7 MB · Views: 43
  • IMG_20240118_225442_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240118_225442_HDR.jpg
    2.4 MB · Views: 42
  • IMG_20240118_225633_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240118_225633_HDR.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 48
  • IMG_20240118_225715_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240118_225715_HDR.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 57

MikeinRome

One Too Many
Messages
1,010
Stetson Number 1 Quality. Lot Number 7688. This hat has the later mfg tag instead of the earlier 3 panel tag. Looks to me like the Lot Numbers in the 7600s is when the tag switch occured. (Just saw where Alan reached this same conclusion back in 2013.)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240118_165650_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240118_165650_HDR.jpg
    4.5 MB · Views: 56
  • IMG_20240118_165801_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240118_165801_HDR.jpg
    3.1 MB · Views: 55
  • IMG_20240118_165941_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240118_165941_HDR.jpg
    3.2 MB · Views: 57
  • IMG_20240118_170033_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240118_170033_HDR.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 54
  • IMG_20240118_170114_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240118_170114_HDR.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 58
Last edited:

MikeinRome

One Too Many
Messages
1,010
"The Sheridan" model hat made for the Bloom Shoe & Clothing Co of Sheridan, Wyoming. It has a mfg tag for Thanhauser Hat Co, but it also has a Stetson Lot Number on the sweatband, Lot Number 224X, so Stetson must have made this hat. I think the hat dates approximately 1912 offhand, and I'm convinced it was made pre 1917 because of the Union label.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240610_195237_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240610_195237_HDR.jpg
    3.4 MB · Views: 34
  • IMG_20240610_195442_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240610_195442_HDR.jpg
    2.5 MB · Views: 33
  • IMG_20240610_195354_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240610_195354_HDR.jpg
    3.8 MB · Views: 40
  • IMG_20240610_195522_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240610_195522_HDR.jpg
    4.5 MB · Views: 35
  • IMG_20240610_222813_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240610_222813_HDR.jpg
    3.1 MB · Views: 34
  • IMG_20240610_195702_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240610_195702_HDR.jpg
    1.7 MB · Views: 38
  • IMG_20240610_200340_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240610_200340_HDR.jpg
    2.7 MB · Views: 38
  • IMG_20240610_195941_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240610_195941_HDR.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 38
  • IMG_20240610_222617_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240610_222617_HDR.jpg
    2.5 MB · Views: 53
  • IMG_20240610_200304_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20240610_200304_HDR.jpg
    2.7 MB · Views: 53
Last edited:
Messages
11,369
Location
Alabama
Smarter than what? Than to accept your say so as proof? Yes I am. You have offered nothing that says Stetson made that hat. A lot # on a sweat yet a completely different mfg tag and size tag than Stetson was using at the time. Maybe, but I don't know that and unless I've missed something, neither do you. You assume too much and expect others to go right along. Not a wise thing coming from a man making remarks about the intelligence of others.
 

MikeinRome

One Too Many
Messages
1,010
Smarter than what? Than to accept your say so as proof? Yes I am. You have offered nothing that says Stetson made that hat. A lot # on a sweat yet a completely different mfg tag and size tag than Stetson was using at the time. Maybe, but I don't know that and unless I've missed something, neither do you. You assume too much and expect others to go right along. Not a wise thing coming from a man making remarks about the intelligence of others.
I'm not remarking about your intelligence. I'm remarking about your lack of same.
 

MikeinRome

One Too Many
Messages
1,010
There it is. Get personal when you have nothing to lean on.
The fastest way you can prove me wrong is for you to start a thread listing all of the known hat manufacturers who had Lot Numbers exactly like that on the back of their sweatbands. Shouldn't take you long- I'd say about 5 minutes, since the grand total of such hatmakers IS EXACTLY ZERO!!!
 
Messages
11,369
Location
Alabama
I'm not trying to prove you wrong. I am trying to get you to show me you are right based on evidence and citation, not based on what you "think, assume or believe" because none of that matters. And you can't do it.
 

MikeinRome

One Too Many
Messages
1,010
I'm not trying to prove you wrong. I am trying to get you to show me you are right based on evidence and citation, not based on what you "think, assume or believe" because none of that matters. And you can't do it.
I'm not here to please you. If you don't like my posts, just consider that they are not directed to you or for you and go about your life. I might not have this attitude if you ever did anything constructive, but all I see from you is gripping and complaining and criticizing what others do.
 
Messages
11,369
Location
Alabama
Mike, you want to continue with this being personal, go ahead but remember, that’s on you. Personally, IDGAF about you or your personal remarks. If I did, you wouldn’t want to play.

What I do care about is the accurate history of hats and how this site is THE repository for said hat history. Your assumptions and conclusions without citation have added nothing to that. Keep deflecting, though. It may eventually work.

Do you have a history of blaming others for your attitude?
 

MikeinRome

One Too Many
Messages
1,010
Mike, you want to continue with this being personal, go ahead but remember, that’s on you. Personally, IDGAF about you or your personal remarks. If I did, you wouldn’t want to play.

What I do care about is the accurate history of hats and how this site is THE repository for said hat history. Your assumptions and conclusions without citation have added nothing to that. Keep deflecting, though. It may eventually work.

Do you have a history of blaming others for your attitude?
Don't recall anybody appointing you as the Fedora Lounge Police.
 

MikeinRome

One Too Many
Messages
1,010
I think the Lot Number placement at rear of hat was a rare mistake, that the sweatband was fed backwards into whatever machine stamps info on it. The reorder number usually found stamped on the right rear was found in the front, where the Lot Number is usually found.
Please ignore what I said here about the sweatband being fed into a machine. I just theorized that nonsense.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
109,096
Messages
3,074,051
Members
54,091
Latest member
toptvsspala
Top