DBLIII said:KeyGrip - that hat is stunning.
Fletch said:There's a grimness to masculinity at all these days, you know. Even just trying to look serious, we sometimes look hard, because seriousness anymore is at least partly a matter of sending signals.
Consider this photomontage I found of three generations of a Marine family.
They all look like ideal, recruiting-poster corporals. But the faces change in important ways as you go from WW2 grandpa, on the right, to Vietnam dad, on the left, to Gulf War son at center.
- Grandpa has an innocent Audie Murphy look. His hat is off his eyebrows, angled a little, with a shock of hair straying out. His mouth is a little open. He has no particular military bearing. Joe Citizen Marine, apple pie still on his breath, giving his all for civilization.
- Dad is the product of a different era and training, with what we recognize as military bearing. His hat is dead level, his face solemn and impassive as George Washington's. He's clean-cut, putting a noble face on in the service of cold war geopolitics.
- Son has the bearing, but that's not all. He radiates myth and menace. His hat covers his brow. His eyes glower. His mouth is tight. The war face. The good guy we believe in because he can be our bad guy. The man on the wall in a world of true believers and cynics and some who are both.
There is no telling who was the better Marine, who loved his country or his buddies more or was the toughest SOB or fought with the most distinction. Let's just say they're all equal that way.
Now ask yourself: What's changed? Why?
de Stokesay said:If you really want to know what has changed, and why, read Lt. Col. Dave Grossman's book "On Killing - The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society?" Really, this book explains it all and answers your question perfectly. Besides, it is really quite an interesting read.
de Stokesay
Now that our curiosity is raised...why don't servicemen smile??DBLIII said:I think it would well explain why many service people don't smile.
Feraud said:Now that our curiosity is raised...why don't servicemen smile??
But that wouldn't explain the differences between the Marine from WWII (who is smiling) up to the most recent picture (very tough/serious) in the ad. They've always had to kill when in war.DBLIII said:I'm sorry, I poorly worded my comment - it was intended toward the book, as in if you've read the book, then the ideas presented would lead the reader to think that someone in service/combat would be tense, since he/she would be fighting an inward battle regarding orders to kill and the unnaturalness of killing (and a lot of other stuff....) so someone in service wouldn't be exactly happy and lighthearted > leading to a stern outward appearance.
I hope I got at least part of that right, it's been a while since I read the book.
Diamondback said:In my case, it's between being grim by nature, and the fact that the price of being one cold, calculating SOB is that you don't get to feel much to provoke a smile--the best I've been able to manage in years is a half-smirk.
Not too sure about radiating myth and menace, but when my platoon had our pictures taken, our drill instructor had previously prepared us...by taking to The Pit for about 20 minutes right before picture time! Bends and thrusts, push-ups, roll us around in the dirt for a while, turn the platoon around so the guys in the front had an opportunity to get the dirt kicked into their faces, then off for the photos!Fletch said:Consider this photomontage I found of three generations of a Marine family.
They all look like ideal, recruiting-poster corporals. But the faces change in important ways as you go from WW2 grandpa, on the right, to Vietnam dad, on the left, to Gulf War son at center.
de Stokesay said:If you really want to know what has changed, and why, read Lt. Col. Dave Grossman's book "On Killing - The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society?" Really, this book explains it all and answers your question perfectly. Besides, it is really quite an interesting read.
de Stokesay