- Messages
- 16,846
So, how about those Knicks?
Pawineguy, we get that according to you any speculation suggesting that the way the leather was tanned may have had a connection to it shrinking is inadmissible on account of Horween posting a page to explain their CXL tanning techniques.
But with respect sir, in the open and inquisitive minds of educated members I suspect your objection to this line of speculation is more inadmissible in this debate than the speculation itself is, on account of there being no possible way for you to substantiate this die hard belief of yours that Horween are somehow beyond reproach. The leather on this jacket has shrunk. Not just this leather, other leather on other jackets from the same place has too.
Granted, it doesn't say so on that page from Horween that you hold so dear, but I think we are pretty much all agreed here that leather is not supposed to shrink. My understanding on this is that the industry standards, which align closely with the US military's, state that the leather should not shrink below temperatures of 97 degrees Celsius.
Perhaps rather than telling us what it definitely isn't down to, you might advance a suggestion or two on what it possibly could be down to? Because that it has shrunk is a stone cold fact
I don't hold anything from Horween to be dear... but again, just as you posted something out of context from Horween (you have noted that the image was sent to you by a 3rd party), the poster above has done the same, and hadn't even taken the 20 seconds to do a quick Google search and find the tanning method of CXL. To call these "educated" speculations is a VERY loose interpretation of the word. As an example, just as you didn't look to see what the image was you were posting, and then incorrectly stated that toggle drying "stretched" leather out, this poster ignored in the same article where it discusses pollutants and their role in shrinking leather. Now, I don't think you wearing the jacket in a polluted area has anything to do with whatever loss of length you have experienced, but if we were making "educated" guesses we'd be looking at all possibilities.
In respect to Horween, perhaps it's the fact that I own my own company, or that I just am partial to these types of family run operations who've managed to survive against long odds, but publicly speculating that they are cutting corners on their leather production and lying about it... that's a bit much for me. Since you well know that air drying CXL is a publicly touted virtue of this product, speculating that they have stopped doing it but don't want us to know is a very serious charge. As is the idea that they forgot how to tan leather and ruined an entire batch, leading to hundreds of shrinking jackets.
If I had come on here and just stated "I think Schitzo got the thing soaking wet, dried it with a hair dryer and doesn't want to admit it", what would your reaction have been? Based on your previous posts I don't think you would have taken it very well.
I am not saying that the Horween change the way of tanning the leather, what I am saying is, is it possible that this is just a small batch of leather that does not meet the standard?
Man, whether someone has posted twice, ten times or one hundred is irrelevant.
An educated person can read the entire post, without weighing in and understand the commentary from all involved.
Why do you have to take such a harsh & personal tone to many who have contributed?
You keep asking your questions and have yet to receive an answer that you are satisfied with. That's fine, but why jump down the throat of anyone who has a differing opinion to yours? I am not merely referencing your response to my post above either.
A clearly defined stance? interesting assumption on your behalf. Actually no, I do not. I am considering right now investing in one of these great horeshide jackets from Scotland and do have an interest.
You've interpreted my post as a 'hurry up'. Yet you readily admit this has been done before now by others. Why is this I wonder?
"which in case you missed it in the 29 pages " & "There is a video on here for you to look at before answering." &"My inkling is, NO, you won't want to dwell on it either..". Again with the accusatory tone, why? This does nothing to enhance your postion nor solicit a willingness to assist.
I have read every single post, seen each picture & even watched your home vid. I do agree that a reasonable person would expect that the natural creases in an elbow would reduce the overall length by a small amount. I also agree that the creases in the back of your jacket appear unlikely to have absorbed the claimed shrinkage. So what? That's my thoughts & this doesn't get you any further down the track to an outcome.
"my posting style is the product of this environment".
If you are unhappy with the responses people are offering freely in a publc forum, then I suggest that you either reconsider posting in the first place, or engage with the respondents in a different manner.
Don't you think that if there was a difinitive answer to your question, it would have most likely been found by now?
And as for being new here, that does not preclude me from owning several great jackets & wishing to continue to contribute to a great, supportive group who have a shared interest & up till now have been welcoming of new members.
I do wish you well in your endevour to find a response that you are satisfied with.
I don't hold anything from Horween to be dear... but again, just as you posted something out of context from Horween (you have noted that the image was sent to you by a 3rd party), the poster above has done the same, and hadn't even taken the 20 seconds to do a quick Google search and find the tanning method of CXL. To call these "educated" speculations is a VERY loose interpretation of the word. As an example, just as you didn't look to see what the image was you were posting, and then incorrectly stated that toggle drying "stretched" leather out, this poster ignored in the same article where it discusses pollutants and their role in shrinking leather. Now, I don't think you wearing the jacket in a polluted area has anything to do with whatever loss of length you have experienced, but if we were making "educated" guesses we'd be looking at all possibilities.
In respect to Horween, perhaps it's the fact that I own my own company, or that I just am partial to these types of family run operations who've managed to survive against long odds, but publicly speculating that they are cutting corners on their leather production and lying about it... that's a bit much for me. Since you well know that air drying CXL is a publicly touted virtue of this product, speculating that they have stopped doing it but don't want us to know is a very serious charge. As is the idea that they forgot how to tan leather and ruined an entire batch, leading to hundreds of shrinking jackets.
If I had come on here and just stated "I think Schitzo got the thing soaking wet, dried it with a hair dryer and doesn't want to admit it", what would your reaction have been? Based on your previous posts I don't think you would have taken it very well.
Dan..
Schitzo's responses to you actually has little to do with your 'newness' here. That is just something that he can use since you seem disagreeable. The berating..belittling..lecturing happens in practically every thread or poll that Schitzo posts. Scolding others has become the biggest part of his process as he has noticed that he can and does get away with it. Matters not who you are,how well liked,how reasonable,or how many posts you have accumulated. If you fail to keep quiet (as he suggests) the next step in his exercise of language is to 'up' the insults. He does somewhat eloquently still manage to play others who somehow become involved in his threads,but woe to those who just don't measure up to his standards. It seems this happens because a schitzo thread can start out innocently enough drawing others in but soon develops into quite something else that he enjoys much more than the topic at hand. He has done quite well in this attempt by successfully dragging out and delaying what would seem to be the gest of his problem. That will be saved for the opportune time to start anew the same procedure with very similar effect. Solving any problem with the jacket is secondary to the game he plays. All one must do is read his responses to others to discover the game. Nothing new here.
HD
According to an earlier post, nearly 100 jackets were made with this batch of leather.
Also, as I said, it is possible that not all the owner of these jackets aware the shrinkage, and they may not on the forum etc...so, as I said, it is my suspect. And it has nothing to do with the general quality of the Horween. As a matter of fact, I still believe they are one of the top leather tanner.
It's a painfully dumb thread. Let it die.
There was something you saw in the photos or video that led you to suspect the jacket was not tanned properly?
I agree with handymike that the place has gotten a bit uneventful lately but seriously, where the hell is this thread going? What's the point? What are you hoping to achieve?
Even if the thread reaches 10,000 pages and we figure out exactly why the jacket had lost half an inch - something that I don't see happening, judging from the course that the discussion has taken in the last ten pages - it still won't change a damn thing. Schitzo would still need a remake and there isn't anything anyone else can do to prevent it from happening again.
What, you think Horween will suddenly jump in with promises never again to stretch dry their leather, followed by Aero offering everyone ever a remake that most definitely, positively will not shrink, ever? Hell, they've done it once already, so why not again? It would be only fair, right?
At the very end, does it truly matter? Jackets shrink. Jackets stretch. Jackets get creases. Who cares. We ain't that good looking to begin with, half an inch sure as paint won't make no difference either way you look at it.
It's a painfully dumb thread. Let it die.
stated as fact, when of course this is merely one opinion among many which differ wildly.
But OK Monitor, we all get what yours is now and if that is what you think and that is what you want to happen, then I guess you and I will be having our next catch up on another thread.
That's not at all what he said. You've even pasted what he did say, so there can be no doubt. This question is spurious and does not deserve to be dignified with an answer
stated as fact, when of course this is merely one opinion among many which differ wildly.
But OK Monitor, we all get what yours is now and if that is what you think and that is what you want to happen, then I guess you and I will be having our next catch up on another thread.