Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Questions for linguists, semanticists, and copy editors

Naphtali

Practically Family
Messages
767
Location
Seeley Lake, Montana
Two questions:

1. What is the purpose for the word "co-conspirator?" The word "conspirator" appears to be the correct term in usage. If the purpose is a function of attorney bafflegab - that is, never use one word when ten will do - I understand; co-conspirator has no purpose.

2. Why is the phrase "enter into" used when, in nearly all circumstances, the term "enter" furnishes accurate information? Another way of phrasing the question might be: Has anyone ever "entered out of?"
 

McDaniel

New in Town
Messages
15
Location
KY and NY
Conspirator is singular...one persond can conspire. Co-conspirator means that another person had joined with the 'conspirator' and thus becomes a 'co-conspirator.

2. Entered means to enter..as to a room. Normally enter into means to join, or jointly/equally be responsibile for..usually legal term as in 'You and I enter into this contract with the intent...etc."
Someone else may have a better answer, but I hope this helps.
 

Naphtali

Practically Family
Messages
767
Location
Seeley Lake, Montana
McDaniel:

Many thanks for your prompt reply. I have responded within your quote. I cannot write that you are wrong; I attempted to raise my issues with your explanation, though. . . . Please don't chew off my ear.
Conspirator is singular...one persond can conspire. Co-conspirator means that another person had joined with the 'conspirator' and thus becomes a 'co-conspirator. What happened to the plural, "conspirators?"

2. Entered means to enter..as to a room. Normally enter into means to join, or jointly/equally be responsibile for..usually legal term as in 'You and I enter into this contract with the intent...etc." When your example sentence deletes "into," it reads: You and I enter this contract with the intent...etc. Is not the meaning of the sentence identical?
Someone else may have a better answer, but I hope this helps.
***
Completely off topic - Does anyone else who wears spectacles view the red text as being on a lower layer within the entire quoted text box? The effect disappears when I don't look through my glasses.
 

subject101

One of the Regulars
Messages
223
Location
Mennoniteborough
Two questions:

1. What is the purpose for the word "co-conspirator?" The word "conspirator" appears to be the correct term in usage. If the purpose is a function of attorney bafflegab - that is, never use one word when ten will do - I understand; co-conspirator has no purpose.

Even we have well documented cases of co-co-conspirators and co-co-co-conspirators. :D :eusa_doh:
 

McDaniel

New in Town
Messages
15
Location
KY and NY
Sorry, didn't finish
Acquisitions Editor: Finds, negotiates for, acquires manuscripts
Line Editor: Performs the actual content edit, (also called the 'line'
edit or 'substansive' edit
Content Editor: Reads for accuracy, balance, fairness, cogency of arugument,
adequatement treatment of subject matters and conformity to the original book proposal.
Copy Editor: Scours the manuscript for accuracy in grammer, citations and factual content.
Proof Reader: Fine tunes puncutation and other details.
All are necessary for a final production of a manuscript into book form.
Sorry to be wordy, but it may help understand my answer.
Thank you Scotrace
 

McDaniel

New in Town
Messages
15
Location
KY and NY
Sorry again, as to your second point..: what happened to 'conspitators' when singular 'conspitor' joins with another they become 'co-conspitors' if others join they may become co-conspitors if equal in rank or they then after may be refered to as: The conspitors, or The conspitors...
 

McDaniel

New in Town
Messages
15
Location
KY and NY
Got to ask, Subject101, where did you find the
black bird? Is that from the first movie with Cortez
or the second with Bette Davis or the final with Bogart?
 
Messages
11,579
Location
Covina, Califonia 91722
Enter into seems to come up when it is a type of arrangement as listed above enter into a contract, an agreement, enter into matrimony. Enter into a new age of prosperity, a commitment. So it might mean more of a change in condition as opposed to an actual whereabouts.
 

scotrace

Head Bartender
Staff member
Messages
14,392
Location
Small Town Ohio, USA
co-conspirators
co-authors
co-founders
co-denfendants


All different in meaning from conspirators, authors, founders.

"Co" signifies a singular example. "Julia Child, Louisette Bertholle and Simmone Beck are co-authors of "Mastering the Art of French Cooking." They worked together on this specific book. They are also just "authors" of the book, but that doesn't quite define what is at work here.

"WEB DuBois, Ida B. Welles, Archibald Grimke, Florence Kelly, and several others co-founded {were co-founders of} the NAACP." All were what could be termed "founders" of something. Specifically, they were co-founders of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

"Sacco and Vanzetti were co-defendants in a murder and robbery trial in Braintree, MA." They were defendants. Specifically, they were co-defendants in this trial.
 

Miss Neecerie

I'll Lock Up
Messages
6,616
Location
The land of Sinatra, Hoboken
co-conspirators
co-authors
co-founders
co-denfendants


All different in meaning from conspirators, authors, founders.

"Co" signifies a singular example. "Julia Child, Louisette Bertholle and Simmone Beck are co-authors of "Mastering the Art of French Cooking." They worked together on this specific book. They are also just "authors" of the book, but that doesn't quite define what is at work here.

"WEB DuBois, Ida B. Welles, Archibald Grimke, Florence Kelly, and several others co-founded {were co-founders of} the NAACP." All were what could be termed "founders" of something. Specifically, they were co-founders of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

"Sacco and Vanzetti were co-defendants in a murder and robbery trial in Braintree, MA." They were defendants. Specifically, they were co-defendants in this trial.

exactly! the normal plural of conspirators does not imply that conspirators were involved in the SAME conspiracy. co-conspirators does imply one conspiracy with multiple parties conspiring together.
 

Yeps

Call Me a Cab
Messages
2,456
Location
Philly
co-conspirators
co-authors
co-founders
co-denfendants


All different in meaning from conspirators, authors, founders.

"Co" signifies a singular example. "Julia Child, Louisette Bertholle and Simmone Beck are co-authors of "Mastering the Art of French Cooking." They worked together on this specific book. They are also just "authors" of the book, but that doesn't quite define what is at work here.

"WEB DuBois, Ida B. Welles, Archibald Grimke, Florence Kelly, and several others co-founded {were co-founders of} the NAACP." All were what could be termed "founders" of something. Specifically, they were co-founders of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

"Sacco and Vanzetti were co-defendants in a murder and robbery trial in Braintree, MA." They were defendants. Specifically, they were co-defendants in this trial.

The problem is that conspirators already includes that prefix in the word, and by it very etymology implies collaboration.
 

Naphtali

Practically Family
Messages
767
Location
Seeley Lake, Montana
[
co-conspirators
co-authors
co-founders
co-denfendants


All different in meaning from conspirators, authors, founders.

"Co" signifies a singular example. "Julia Child, Louisette Bertholle and Simmone Beck are co-authors of "Mastering the Art of French Cooking." They worked together on this specific book. They are also just "authors" of the book, but that doesn't quite define what is at work here.

"WEB DuBois, Ida B. Welles, Archibald Grimke, Florence Kelly, and several others co-founded {were co-founders of} the NAACP." All were what could be termed "founders" of something. Specifically, they were co-founders of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

"Sacco and Vanzetti were co-defendants in a murder and robbery trial in Braintree, MA." They were defendants. Specifically, they were co-defendants in this trial.

Am I stubborn or, perhaps, unable to easily discern nuance?

"Julia Child, Louisette Bertholle and Simmone Beck are ["the" is optional] authors of "Mastering the Art of French Cooking." The meaning appears identical to your example. Is there any other interpretation regarding authorship of the book?

"WEB DuBois, Ida B. Welles, Archibald Grimke, Florence Kelly, and several others founded the NAACP." This appears to be accurate and precise.

"Sacco and Vanzetti were co-defendants in a murder and robbery trial in Braintree, MA." Alter verbiage to: "Sacco and Vanzetti were defendants in their murder and robbery trial in Braintree, MA." The meaning, again appears to be accurate and precise.
 

HodgePodge

One of the Regulars
Messages
264
Location
Canada
I'm going to risk a fight here and suggest that this is boiling down to stylistic preference. I don't see how the meanings of the phrases are any less accurate when making use of words with a "co-" prefix.
 

Miss Neecerie

I'll Lock Up
Messages
6,616
Location
The land of Sinatra, Hoboken
The problem is that conspirators already includes that prefix in the word, and by it very etymology implies collaboration.

Small technicality here....but the word conspirators does not contain the prefix co-. It contains the prefix con- .
They are related and indeed carry similar meanings, but are still different prefixes.

I am being fussy I know...but if the prefix in conspire was co- that would make the word it attaches to nspire which is not a word in english at all.

con- spire..... -spire from the latin word for breath...... to breathe together.
 
Messages
11,579
Location
Covina, Califonia 91722
Small technicality here....but the word conspirators does not contain the prefix co-. It contains the prefix con- .
They are related and indeed carry similar meanings, but are still different prefixes. I am being fussy I know...but if the prefix in conspire was co- that would make the word it attaches to nspire which is not a word in english at all. con- spire..... -spire from the latin word for breath...... to breathe together.

Excellent! That cut to the heart of the matter. A gold start for you! The English language can sometimes be very precise and as it has been said before words do have meaning.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
109,096
Messages
3,074,057
Members
54,091
Latest member
toptvsspala
Top