Roger
A-List Customer
- Messages
- 320
Let's not confuse "critcial thinking" with critcising someone who thinks and has faith in their abilities. There is a difference.:eusa_doh:
lol I would never do well with being in boot camp! I'm too strong willed to be bullied!carebear said:Never been face to face with an enraged drill instrctor, have you?
All I have to do now, coming on 15 years later, is remember them. that's enough motivation for me.
Thanks. Yes, that is exactly what I was thinking. It's like an innate nagging inside of me that tells me to trust or not to. But, to me it's a feeling that I don't always think something supernatural is behind.mysterygal said:Daisy, it seems what you're talking about is discernment, and not everybody has it. It is how you say, without any tangible reason for trust in a person, you know they can be depended upon. I too, can tell after meeting a person who's trustable and who I should keep at a distance. I've never been wrong with those I trusted right off. I think some of it is instinct as well, it comes out most strongly with my children, sometimes without outside explanation, I just know not to bring my child to a certain place or let them be babysat by a certain person.
Maj.Nick Danger said:That is the key to faith, "religious" or "otherwise".
One has to believe unwaveringly. One moment of doubt will ruin everything.
Maj.Nick Danger said:That is the key to faith, "religious" or "otherwise".
One has to believe unwaveringly. One moment of doubt will ruin everything.
Daisy Buchanan said:Thanks. Yes, that is exactly what I was thinking. It's like an innate nagging inside of me that tells me to trust or not to. But, to me it's a feeling that I don't always think something supernatural is behind.
Thanks for helping me try and figure out a name for it. I don't know why, but I've always felt that getting my ideas out about the different kinds of faith and trust, can be so difficult to explain. Too many sides, so many different definitions and ideas.
John in Covina said:There are theories that certain seemingly preconitive awareness is due to processing of information at a higher level than the regular conscience. In certain situations these minute readings of people or situations bring a judgement that seems like predicting the future.
John in Covina said:Jeff Cooper's "Principles of Personal Defense"
1- Awareness: Be Ready , Be alert
2- Decisiveness: Bring all force to bear, do not delay
3- Agressiveness: Be indignant, be angry when you give it all you've got, to destroy your enemy
4- Speed: the perfect defense is a counterattack that succeeds before the assailant has realized he has bitten off more than he can chew. Retaliate instantly, speed is your salvation, there is no referee to call what they have done as unfair.
5- Coolness: Under any sort of attack keep cool and shoot with precision.
6- Ruthlessness: when you life is in danger you must take the other man out, if armed he is a danger as long as he is conscious. If attacked you cannot be kind, you must be tough, harsh and ruthless.
7- Surprise: by combining the above you can confuse you attacker and suprise them simply by fighting back.
carebear said:I'm trying to modify my warlike image so I didn't go there John. You did hear Jeff finally passed just a bit ago?
John in Covina said:I am out of the loop on that and had not heard. His editorials were often awesome.
Lincsong said:A few people know from experience the soundness of persistence. They are the ones who have not accepted defeat as being anything more than temporary. They are the ones whose desires are so persistently applied that defeat is finally changed into victory.:eusa_clap Those who stand on the sidelines of life see the overwhelmingly large number who go down into defeat, never to rise again. But,what few see or suspect of existing, is the silent power which comes to the rescue of those who fight on in the face of discouragement.
Katt in Hat said:You have started 4 or so threads recently and it appears that many of the words and ideas are not your own, but cut and pasted. Others who use source materials acknowledge the original writer. I've read enough of your posts in past months to recognize your natural style. Or am I wrong?