You might want to have your dad tested for alzheimer's. It can't hurt.I agree. My father never failed a flight physical. He was in excellent health (for his age) the day he taxied his plane into the ditch.
You might want to have your dad tested for alzheimer's. It can't hurt.I agree. My father never failed a flight physical. He was in excellent health (for his age) the day he taxied his plane into the ditch.
In defense of 80 year old pilots, from everything I've ever read and seen, pilots just get better and better with age. I know the reflexes are not the same, so they might not be good fighter pilots any more, but I would feel safe with any 70 or 80 year old pilot who has been flying continuously and keeping up his proficiency. I'm sure there was a mechanical problem. They said he appeared to be trying to aim the plane away from the crowd. I doubt a younger pilot could have done significantly better in the circumstances.
I believe the radio also mentioned that there had been modifications including changing the dimensions of the wings to try to make the plane faster. I could understand how modifying one part could change the stress on another ...Just heard on the radio it had years of overhauls and rebuilding and they're focusing on the rear where the pix seem to show a failure.
Is the trim tab important?
Presumably if it wasn't important, they wouldn't put it there
I believe the radio also mentioned that there had been modifications including changing the dimensions of the wings to try to make the plane faster. I could understand how modifying one part could change the stress on another ...
I believe the radio also mentioned that there had been modifications including changing the dimensions of the wings to try to make the plane faster. I could understand how modifying one part could change the stress on another ...
The problem with pilots of that age is not their ability to operate the aircraft but the likelihood of them having a medical incident while in flight. Face it, when you get up there in age you can stroke out at any moment, whether flying a plane or tying your shoes. I vaguely recall Chuck Yeager expressing the same in an interview some time ago.
Its not so much the age that causes strokes. There has to be pre existing disease. Strokes can occur in young females (caused by vascular disease related to BC pills). There are a lot of variables here, namely those that lead to vascular disease. Diabetes, obesity, genetics etc. Hopefully pilots are screened for these pre-existing diseases, and weeded out if conditions warrant.The problem with pilots of that age is not their ability to operate the aircraft but the likelihood of them having a medical incident while in flight. Face it, when you get up there in age you can stroke out at any moment, whether flying a plane or tying your shoes. I vaguely recall Chuck Yeager expressing the same in an interview some time ago.
And yet 75% of strokes occur to those age 65 and older. Spare me you pedantry.Its not so much the age that causes strokes. .
That would account for a lot of what is seen in the footage and still shots of the aircraft!As of today... the NTSB has a theory that Jimmy's seat failed and collapsed sending him backwards into the cockpit...which would explain the photos of not seeing him through the canopy as the plane was going down. Laying down on your back, straped down to a seat that is no longer upright and with the G forces flying at full power at over 425 m.p.h., would explain a lot of why Jimmy could not regain control of the aircraft. Jimmy was not a big man...probably about 5' 5" and could not possibly reach the controls and correct the aircraft flight path in the 25 seconds he had left to fly. That would also explain why the tail wheel was in the down position as the actuator for the tail wheel is directly behind and below the pilot seat.
Jim