Marseille
New in Town
- Messages
- 2
- Location
- France/Ukraine
Hi to all,
I have been consulting regularly this forum for quite a few months now, being always impressed by the high-level of most of the contributions – my congratulations to all of you for this - and all my thanks to keep this spirit alive through your dedication to details and respect of authenticity.
As many here I am an aviation enthusiast and have been collecting aviation-related items for quite some times now... with a special interest for 1930-1940 Soviet pilot equipments, uniforms, etc.
That's how I came to buy my first mod. 40 Eastman Irvin in 2005. I have been wearing it every winter since (although French, I live in former Soviet Union and weather is perfect for Irvins...) , it got a very nice patina and I love it - or loved it, until a "profesionnal" to whom I gave my beloved Irvin for dry cleaning thought it would deserve a new "paint"... This idiot had no better idea than spraying my whole Irvin with a cheap-red colour to make it look newer...:rage: But all this is past now, and with a lot of philosophy I have learned to live with it (and believe me I have tried everything to give back to my Irvin his old appearance and the maximum of the patina it had).
But the reason I an writing is different: I have recently bought in France a reportedly "barn-found" Irvin... I like to believe nice stories, and although the overal design, shape (and smell!!...) indicate (for me at least) it could be an original, I am not 100% convinced and would be happy to get some comments on this...
Here are some pics:
The zippers bear the mention "Aero – Great Britain", but this Irvin does not seem to me to be an Aero copy (sorry if I look naïve…). It has an overall long design (has Aero ever produced such Irvins?...), no ventilation holes on armpits, a collar strap on the other side, a belt buckle with a non-standard design…
Patina, smell and quality are there like on an original (?) but this mention "Aero" disturbs me... Grateful for any comment or indication!!
All the best,
Marseille
I have been consulting regularly this forum for quite a few months now, being always impressed by the high-level of most of the contributions – my congratulations to all of you for this - and all my thanks to keep this spirit alive through your dedication to details and respect of authenticity.
As many here I am an aviation enthusiast and have been collecting aviation-related items for quite some times now... with a special interest for 1930-1940 Soviet pilot equipments, uniforms, etc.
That's how I came to buy my first mod. 40 Eastman Irvin in 2005. I have been wearing it every winter since (although French, I live in former Soviet Union and weather is perfect for Irvins...) , it got a very nice patina and I love it - or loved it, until a "profesionnal" to whom I gave my beloved Irvin for dry cleaning thought it would deserve a new "paint"... This idiot had no better idea than spraying my whole Irvin with a cheap-red colour to make it look newer...:rage: But all this is past now, and with a lot of philosophy I have learned to live with it (and believe me I have tried everything to give back to my Irvin his old appearance and the maximum of the patina it had).
But the reason I an writing is different: I have recently bought in France a reportedly "barn-found" Irvin... I like to believe nice stories, and although the overal design, shape (and smell!!...) indicate (for me at least) it could be an original, I am not 100% convinced and would be happy to get some comments on this...
Here are some pics:
The zippers bear the mention "Aero – Great Britain", but this Irvin does not seem to me to be an Aero copy (sorry if I look naïve…). It has an overall long design (has Aero ever produced such Irvins?...), no ventilation holes on armpits, a collar strap on the other side, a belt buckle with a non-standard design…
Patina, smell and quality are there like on an original (?) but this mention "Aero" disturbs me... Grateful for any comment or indication!!
All the best,
Marseille