Fletch
I'll Lock Up
- Messages
- 8,865
- Location
- Iowa - The Land That Stuff Forgot
This article from 1999, interviewing Michael Harris, then of Paul's Hatworks, picks up on a theme that always interests me: the phenomenon of hatmaking as a dying craft that still keeps secrets.
In 1999 there were probably no online resources for men's hatmaking. The market had been drying up for decades. Hatters were in a state of lockdown, holding onto every bit of the trade for themselves while it lasted. Harris was asked to leave shops for asking questions, had to wait for shops to go broke to find the tools he needed, and work in mass production for 9 years to qualify for an apprenticeship with Paul's.
Some questions inevitably occur to us outside the craft. Craftspeople care little for the dynamics of business, and businesspeople left the industry (and many other skilled crafts) behind decades ago. So it remains to be asked:
1. What's the tipping point? Does it make more sense, at some point, for a skilled craft to break the guild mentality and start passing things on? If not, why not? Might it have seemed, at one time, that letting hatmaking disappear was actually an honor to the men who had done it?
2. How much of the decline in hat trade was due to snowballing? (The harder it is to get quality and/or service in a good, the fewer buyers will want that good.) Was it rational self-interest for individual hat shops to fight competition as they went under?
3. Has the internet, including small mail-order hatters and information clearinghouses like FL, done anything much to counter the tradition of the craft dying? Have guild mentalities begun to soften? Has the internet built up even a niche market in a substantial way?
4. Might Harris have been exaggerating for public relations purposes? Any trade, craft, or product is more prized the more exclusive it is.
In 1999 there were probably no online resources for men's hatmaking. The market had been drying up for decades. Hatters were in a state of lockdown, holding onto every bit of the trade for themselves while it lasted. Harris was asked to leave shops for asking questions, had to wait for shops to go broke to find the tools he needed, and work in mass production for 9 years to qualify for an apprenticeship with Paul's.
Some questions inevitably occur to us outside the craft. Craftspeople care little for the dynamics of business, and businesspeople left the industry (and many other skilled crafts) behind decades ago. So it remains to be asked:
1. What's the tipping point? Does it make more sense, at some point, for a skilled craft to break the guild mentality and start passing things on? If not, why not? Might it have seemed, at one time, that letting hatmaking disappear was actually an honor to the men who had done it?
2. How much of the decline in hat trade was due to snowballing? (The harder it is to get quality and/or service in a good, the fewer buyers will want that good.) Was it rational self-interest for individual hat shops to fight competition as they went under?
3. Has the internet, including small mail-order hatters and information clearinghouses like FL, done anything much to counter the tradition of the craft dying? Have guild mentalities begun to soften? Has the internet built up even a niche market in a substantial way?
4. Might Harris have been exaggerating for public relations purposes? Any trade, craft, or product is more prized the more exclusive it is.
Last edited: