Superfluous
My Mail is Forwarded Here
- Messages
- 3,995
- Location
- Missing in action
Over the years, I have seen, and participated in, numerous discussions -- some evolving into debates or even arguments -- regarding which is the "best" leather for a jacket. I am fully aware of the objective criteria that can be applied. However, in the end, the "best" leather for me is not the one that exceeds others in terms of objective criteria. Rather, the "best" leather for me is the leather that feels the best to me. I don't exalt Shinki HH based on objective criteria. Rather, I exalt Shinki HH because, in my ever so subjective opinion, Shinki feels the best . . . it has the right combination of weight and pliability for me. In my humble and subjective opinion, Horween's FQHH is too heavy and rigid, ELMC's HH is too light, BK's Liberty HH is too similar to vinyl, etc. I am luke warm about Vincenza HH. However, in the end, Shinki HH has the right balance for my personal taste. Therefore, Shinki is "best" for me. On the other hand, Shinki is clearly not "best" for everyone.
As we delve deeper and deeper into this Rabbit Hole of leather jackets, we inevitably refine and define our personal tastes . . . what we like best, and what we do not like as much. Ultimately, the "best" leather is the leather that best satisfies our individual and subjective preferences, as refined through personal experience. Objective criteria, while interesting to discuss, must give way to subjective feel.
In the end, I just like the way it feels. Its that simple.
As we delve deeper and deeper into this Rabbit Hole of leather jackets, we inevitably refine and define our personal tastes . . . what we like best, and what we do not like as much. Ultimately, the "best" leather is the leather that best satisfies our individual and subjective preferences, as refined through personal experience. Objective criteria, while interesting to discuss, must give way to subjective feel.
In the end, I just like the way it feels. Its that simple.