Emotional Rescue?
Perhaps we could make this thread sort of radioactive, by diverting it towards the question: which brands are generally over or under-rated?
That should annoy a lot of people.
One (nasty, unhinged) hatter used to rant about how vintage Borsalinos were garbage, for instance. He was, of course, an idiot. That said, I will argue that *some* vintage Borsalinos really aren't anything special, and -- moreover -- that the best of the vintage Borsos are from years you wouldn't expect: mine have been from the 60s and 70s. (Generally thick velour or longhair felt.)
We've already heard from various members who politely place Stetsons at the bottom of the ladder (with a few exceptions: vintage 100s, for instance) -- from my modest experience of the brand, I would have to agree.
On the other hand, I don't think I've ever seen a really lousy Knox, or Dobbs, or Churchill.
Let the fire fly.
Perhaps we could make this thread sort of radioactive, by diverting it towards the question: which brands are generally over or under-rated?
That should annoy a lot of people.
One (nasty, unhinged) hatter used to rant about how vintage Borsalinos were garbage, for instance. He was, of course, an idiot. That said, I will argue that *some* vintage Borsalinos really aren't anything special, and -- moreover -- that the best of the vintage Borsos are from years you wouldn't expect: mine have been from the 60s and 70s. (Generally thick velour or longhair felt.)
We've already heard from various members who politely place Stetsons at the bottom of the ladder (with a few exceptions: vintage 100s, for instance) -- from my modest experience of the brand, I would have to agree.
On the other hand, I don't think I've ever seen a really lousy Knox, or Dobbs, or Churchill.
Let the fire fly.