No I don't think so. I've got a Montgomery shearling lined jacket from the forties and it's made of lighter HH than that. I had to take it apart and remake it once and I saw exactly how well it was made, and it was fairly utilitarian. They were not high end brands like the best makers today. But they didn't need to be made of shoe leather to last a lifetime either.
IMO the modern fetish for as thick and heavy as you can get on your back is a little like drunks in a curry house trying to outdo each other in the hottest curry they can eat before one falls onto the floor with a coronary. You see them sweating buckets, red and gasping and telling each other how much they are enjoying it.
My vintage Hercules is a mid weight hide as well, although the Steerhide they used was substantial.
Thanks. I didn't think so but didn't know if it may have been a different grade.
I've got moccasins comparable to my Aero FQHH but really like the Hercules FQHH.
Wish it was a tad bigger. Maybe my son will wear it. Was listed as a 44, hoped it was at least a 42 but looks like it's a 40.
My latest AL CXL steer jackets have shown no different wear than ay other Horween jacket and the 20013 Roadster is wearing in exactly like my 2007 Aero FQHH CXL Highwayman. My most recently made Aero is a 2010 HB Deluxe and it shows no different wear to any of my CXL jackets - Horse or Steer ( albeit the steer tends to soften a little quicker than the horse ... but this tends to be more a feature of thickness rather than genetics IMHO) .
As with all leather materials this is different for different jackets and even down to specific panels within the same jacket .... this is the nature of Horween CXL, it's a natural hand finished product and hand surface dyed ( not vat dipped) ... the surface coating is durable but not everlasting and naturally wears to show the basecoat ( which is generally a dark brown colour or if scraped when new a lighter brown ( but which naturally darkens with wear). It wears very differently to veg tanned and vat dyed leather which is much more consistant and when scraped will not show a different base colour .... as mentioned before this is a matter of consumer choice.
HTH
Plumb, have appreciated your comments, but my FQHH Highwayman seems to be performing much differently from yours. My shoulders and sleeves are showing excessive wear. This isn't really a matter of consumer choice, as I chose my Horween leather based off of a sample, and the jacket is not aging anything like the sample. I have some more pics that show lots of wear on the sleeves... I'll start a new thread soon.
Sorry to make my first post on this site negative, but I have to agree with sshack. I purchased two Aeros from Thurston/Insurrection a couple of months apart this past summer. I have worn both equally. Both black FQHH. The first one looks good, shows some dings and wear, but what I would characterize as normal.
The second, newer jacket is showing grey, probably soon to be white, on contact surfaces, like sshack's jacket. I forwarded to Thurston a link to this thread with sshack's photo and they insist this is normal wear. I responded that the issue was the short time and light usage resulting in this amount of wear -- this might be normal if the jacket was a few years old or something, not a few weeks.
So I am not too happy with the allegedly outstanding customer service from Thurston -- they were very helpful when I was ordering and buying but not helpful when this problem with the one jacket arose.
I understand that lots of folks might like the quick wear, makes the repro jackets look more vintage. But the second jacket I ordered was to obtain a repro of a specific type of old police jacket. I have an old, original Cal Leathers police horsehide jacket that was beat to heck on duty and it did not wear like this Aero repro is wearing. Thurston told me when selling me the jacket that this was the most accurate repro, but when the problem arose they basically told me tough (my words, not theirs, but that was the implication because they were not going to refund my money or even replace the jacket).
Like I said, maybe the majority of buyers like this super-quick wear, but it is not what I thought I was buying. This no heirloom jacket that you can hand down -- it will be white by that time.
You were asked to provide photos or send the jacket back to us so we could assess the situation. You did neither. You ended our correspondence with three words, "End of Discussion."
If you'd like to allow us to assess the wear to your jacket, you need to either
A) Provide us with photos
or
B) send the jacket back to us
By doing either A or B, this will allow us to assess the situation. As we informed you, Aero is amenable to a remake if the wear is abnormal. However, we cannot assess the situation blindly or based on photos of another person's jacket.
Could not get the photo to post so here is a link to it.
http://s919.photobucket.com/user/di...rt=3&o=0&_suid=138575493500807238719238637857
Sloan - I really didnt know you could do that, great tip!
Hi, Greenbird. Feel free to post a pic-- I agree, it would be helpful. Also, do you have any idea why only one of your black FQHH jackets are showing premature wear? Do you see any difference in the leather texture, thickness, etc? Thanks!