Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Historical clothing that Hollywood has trouble with

Panache

A-List Customer
Messages
344
Location
California Bay Area
Chasseur,

Great post. I was struck by this part

Chasseur said:
.... So leading men:

(1) Are normally in leather riding boots not buckled shoes (contrary to what Fletch says hollywood seems to think high boots are for men ;) ) even when they no where near a horse (like on a ship or making rocking chairs...). I think Gibson's exterior use of leather garters and boots in "The Patriot" was again a way of making him look more "rustic and manly."

Another problem period that costumers refuse to get right in this respect for male attire is the court of Queen Elizabeth I. In movies, television programs, re-enactor/Living history events, and Renaisance faires no one will accept that riding boots were worn only when...riding (or at least outdoors)! The rest of the time at court the gentlemen donned slipper-like shoes that were worn with white hose and short pantaloons that emphasized the man's leg.

Because a modern audience refuses to accept that standards of masculine dress were different in different times and places they "modernize" it to make it look right to a modern audience.

Cheers

Jamie


P.S. I think you were a bit harsh on Mel Gibson's "The Patriot". This movie was costume-wise very acurrate....

...compared to Mel Gibson's "Braveheart" at least! lol
 

Paisley

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,439
Location
Indianapolis
Re: Dances with Wolves, one of the characters was a white woman who had been raised by Native Americans ("Stands with a Fist," I think they called her). Her hair looked like it was cut in layers, moussed and blow-dried.
mmfist8_1.jpg
 

Paisley

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,439
Location
Indianapolis
The 70s Cher look (straight, flat hair) but worn in braids would have made sense.

The big, layered 80s hair look does not make sense, unless that tipi in the background is a salon.
 

Paisley

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,439
Location
Indianapolis
Speaking of beaded hair, I wonder if Caribbean pirates wore beads in their beards a la Jack Sparrow. And eyeliner. At least the bad teeth of the rest of the crew were probably spot on.
 
Paisley said:
Speaking of beaded hair, I wonder if Caribbean pirates wore beads in their beards a la Jack Sparrow. And eyeliner. At least the bad teeth were probably spot on.


Well, we do know that Blackbeard braided his beard and used it to light canon fuses. No eyeliner but likely fairly bad teeth was present. [huh]
Jack Sparrow certainly looked dirty enough though. I swear I could smell him through the screen. *yucky* shakeshead :whistling
 

AmateisGal

I'll Lock Up
Messages
6,126
Location
Nebraska
dhermann1 said:
On this same topic, another thing that has always driven me up the wall was the way Hollywood coiffed the women in WW II movies in the generation after the war. How many films made around 1960 do you see with Sophia Loren or Angie Dickenson (just thinking of Dr Newman MD, which was on last night) and they're wearing a totally up to date 60's bouffant? Yes, granted, a lot of the styles thought classy in 1943 were though of as frumpy as hell by 1960, but those hair styles just kill my suspension of disbelief for WW II flicks of the 50's and 60's.

Oh my gosh, this bothers me, too! And they do it ALL the time in those 60s films. I just can't figure out why they thought it was OK for the women to wear their hair like that. Sheesh. I guess you'd think someone would say, "Uh, wait a minute. They didn't have beehives back then, did they?" [huh]
 

1961MJS

My Mail is Forwarded Here
Messages
3,370
Location
Norman Oklahoma
Paisley said:
Speaking of beaded hair, I wonder if Caribbean pirates wore beads in their beards a la Jack Sparrow. And eyeliner. At least the bad teeth of the rest of the crew were probably spot on.

Hi

Was that supposed to look like eye liner, or was he supposed to look VERY VERY tired? Just guessin'.

Later
 

LordBest

Practically Family
Messages
692
Location
Australia
This is rather what I mean about laziness and ignorance. A quick look at accurate historical outfits will show that they are not un-flashy and un-dramatic, quite the contrary. Even the peasants could dress in vivid colours, contrary to popular opinion.


Fletch said:
4. Another word about cost. Hollywood accounting can excuse anything producers want, and excuses nothing they do not approve of. $10 million for flashy, dramatic wardrobe and an award-winning costumer is not a cost concern. $250,000 for un-flashy, drama-less wardrobe and a low-paid researcher is.
 

Yeps

Call Me a Cab
Messages
2,456
Location
Philly
LordBest said:
This is rather what I mean about laziness and ignorance. A quick look at accurate historical outfits will show that they are not un-flashy and un-dramatic, quite the contrary. Even the peasants could dress in vivid colours, contrary to popular opinion.

Speaking from the poor 18th century colonial standpoint (really the only period on which I have any expertise) yes, they wore bright colors, but they didn't stay that bright. Especially red, that faded very quickly with period dyes, nonetheless, red garments were very popular. Blue was extremely popular, because the plans which produce the dye are very easy to grow.
 

LordBest

Practically Family
Messages
692
Location
Australia
Quite so. The oldest major survival I know of is a padded coat of Charles VI (died 1422) extant in Chartres Cathedral (from memory). Going by contemporary illustrations it would have been a rich red, it is now more of an orange. Admittedly it's nearly six hundred years old.


Yeps said:
Speaking from the poor 18th century colonial standpoint (really the only period on which I have any expertise) yes, they wore bright colors, but they didn't stay that bright. Especially red, that faded very quickly with period dyes, nonetheless, red garments were very popular. Blue was extremely popular, because the plans which produce the dye are very easy to grow.
 

swinggal

One Too Many
Messages
1,386
Location
Perth, Australia
Have a look at 'The Glenn Miller Story' some time. It was made in 1954 and it's portrayal of fashion in the 30s and 40s is basically non-existant. Even when I watched this as a kid I knew it wasn't right. June Allyson's clothes are straight out of the 50s as is her hair. The men's fashion is also very 50s looking.

glenn-miller-story-DVDcover.jpg


The Benny Goodman story is the same. Check out Donna Reed's outfit in the poster.

AP238-benny-goodman-story-movie-poster.jpg


I mean, I did love these movies as a kid and still like to watch them (despite the all the fashion and factual inaccuracies.) Many movies made in the 50s and 60s ABOUT the 20s to the 40s all seem to stick with the fashions and hairstyles from the year the movie is being made. Why was that I wonder? Did they not care about portraying recent history correctly?
 

swinggal

One Too Many
Messages
1,386
Location
Perth, Australia
Paisley said:
Re: Dances with Wolves, one of the characters was a white woman who had been raised by Native Americans ("Stands with a Fist," I think they called her). Her hair looked like it was cut in layers, moussed and blow-dried.
mmfist8_1.jpg

I know. In reality she would have had really long hair down her back and plaited like the rest of the women in the tribe so that she fitted in. I always thought she looked ridiculous.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
109,097
Messages
3,074,080
Members
54,091
Latest member
toptvsspala
Top