That’s brilliant actually. I say meant for matchbooks b/c I’ve had a few that had a plastic feeling pocket liner. Like it was meant to be water resistant.Lol, ton, with many of those vintage jackets not having internal pockets and outside pockets being ornamental, this has been my wallet of late. It works with most of my vintage jackets. View attachment 463333
I think the chest pocket was meant for cigarettes. I think I saw some old ad for a jacket where the chest pocket bag was rubberized for waterproofness.LOL. The phone argument is pretty hilarious for a remake of a 1930’s jacket! I actually think your jacket has it placed exactly where it should be. From an aesthetics standpoint it’s perfect. Tbh I always consider these pockets ornamental. They typically are not wide nor deep enough to hold anything, which is true to the original pockets:
View attachment 463326 View attachment 463327
^These pockets seem meant for matchbooks.
This is really the only truly useable chest pocket design for larger items:
View attachment 463328
This is why small ornamental pockets that are misplaced on a jacket is so bothersome to me…it really serves no purpose other than to look good, so it should do just that. Sorry for letting my Asperger’s slip into the thread. I agree the OP should return this jacket post haste and get one that fits properly.
Yes the vintage jackets have tiny chest pockets. But the RC repro has big enough ones. So technically not a repro but a "vintage style". Actually most repro jackets I have come with big enough chest pockets, hence rendering them all vintage style rather than direct reproduction I suppose but more fitting for daily wear.LOL. The phone argument is pretty hilarious for a remake of a 1930’s jacket! I actually think your jacket has it placed exactly where it should be. From an aesthetics standpoint it’s perfect. Tbh I always consider these pockets ornamental. They typically are not wide nor deep enough to hold anything, which is true to the original pockets:
View attachment 463326 View attachment 463327
^These pockets seem meant for matchbooks.
This is really the only truly useable chest pocket design for larger items:
View attachment 463328
This is why small ornamental pockets that are misplaced on a jacket is so bothersome to me…it really serves no purpose other than to look good, so it should do just that. Sorry for letting my Asperger’s slip into the thread. I agree the OP should return this jacket post haste and get one that fits properly.
This is what you need:Yes the vintage jackets have tiny chest pockets. But the RC repro has big enough ones. So technically not a repro but a "vintage style". Actually most repro jackets I have come with big enough chest pockets, hence rendering them all vintage style rather than direct reproduction I suppose but more fitting for daily wear.
View attachment 463366 View attachment 463367
I haven't smoked for many years but when I did I always carried them in my shirt pocket, never jacket. I don't always have my jacket, and when I wanted a smoke I HAD to have a smoke. But times were different then. And definitely different now.
After seeing more info from OP I too have suggested him to ask for a remake. It's an expensive jacket from Himel and I think he can get it right the second time.
yeah phone keeps getting bigger and more expensive without any real added benefits but every few years they break down and new roll over plans comes out. Biggest scam of all time.This is what you need:
https://www.thelightphone.com/
I have the iPhone 12 mini and I think this^ will likely be my next phone. The mini is too big for most chest pockets, not to mention the pocket bags are seldom deep enough. More importantly the smart phone has become too much of an unwanted appendage.
Nice piece and would also correspond to my inner minimalist. Only in practice I am not one (otherwise I would have only two leather jackets and two pairs of shoes).This is what you need:
https://www.thelightphone.com/
I have the iPhone 12 mini and I think this^ will likely be my next phone. The mini is too big for most chest pockets, not to mention the pocket bags are seldom deep enough. More importantly the smart phone has become too much of an unwanted appendage.
Why is it so hard to get this type of jacket (half belt, sports jacket, etc)to fit right? I've seen so few ideal fits compared to the multitude of people spending $$$ on mediocre fits, and I include myself in that category. Even going custom or bespoke doesn't seem to avoid the pitfalls. Is it adherence to historical accuracy, and the old patterns are not suited to the modern physique or provide poor mobility? Did everyone's clothes just fit poorly back then? Are we trying to impose a modern interpretation of a good fit on a vintage style? Should we give up and just wear track suits?
These are great looking jackets. I've seen pics of you wearing them before but I never noticed the high pocket placement tbh. My eye was drawn to the perfect shape of the collar.Hm, $$$ for sure, but I do like the fit on mine. Brown one is custom, black one was bought from a fellow lounger. Not so hard to get the "fit" right if you know what to look at. If a specific pattern SUITS your body type etc. is a question of personal preferences (think A-2 on a round, stocky guy vs. a tall, lean fellow).
As to the chest-pocket: I didn´t realize it is indeed positioned quite high. Never noticed. I see what irritates people, but these things don´t really bother me personally...
View attachment 463386 View attachment 463387 View attachment 463387
A few companies like Nokia still make the old style mobile. I wonder if there is any need for a "new" product like the light phone. LOL. In any case, it will never work for me as we are required by the local Gov't to install a Covid app.This is what you need:
https://www.thelightphone.com/
I have the iPhone 12 mini and I think this^ will likely be my next phone. The mini is too big for most chest pockets, not to mention the pocket bags are seldom deep enough. More importantly the smart phone has become too much of an unwanted appendage.
The original is just in a league of its own. What an incredible looking jacket.These are great looking jackets. I've seen pics of you wearing them before but I never noticed the high pocket placement tbh. My eye was drawn to the perfect shape of the collar.
Here's a Himel next to an original. I do agree with @ton312, half an inch lower does look better.
View attachment 463391
It is the coolest jacket ever, imo.The original is just in a league of its own. What an incredible looking jacket.
Thanks Mike, and also the Hercules pattern (at least made by JC) is far more forgiving to wear.If you can get your hands on a GW...
John’s Hercules is incredible and historically accurate.
https://www.thefedoralounge.com/threads/incoming-good-wear-hercules.107037/
https://www.thefedoralounge.com/attachments/17c5e876-d303-4476-9726-df417e0b33a1-jpeg.404450/
good luck and let us know how you make out with this.Thanks for your help everyone. I’ve asked Himel for a remake and sent my jacket out, along with a better description of how I prefer the fit. Fingers crossed that it’ll come back fitting better.
I love my GW Hercules.If you can get your hands on a GW...
John’s Hercules is incredible and historically accurate.
The chest pocket height on that is PERFECT!I love my GW Hercules. View attachment 463693 I will say though that it is my least comfortable GW. The Ventura and the Arcadia are both much easier to wear and allow for more mobility.
I love my GW Hercules. View attachment 463693 I will say though that it is my least comfortable GW. The Ventura and the Arcadia are both much easier to wear and allow for more mobility.