They still use Cobol and Fortran, right?Except for critical infrastructure and banking “software “! (Middleware)
They still use Cobol and Fortran, right?Except for critical infrastructure and banking “software “! (Middleware)
They still use Cobol and Fortran, right?
Beautiful Californian. Too bad I missed it.
This is an Albert Richard, not a CalifornianBeautiful Californian. Too bad I missed it.
Dang that went fast! Hopefully someone in here got it.
I was wondering how you determine this was an AR? Can you please share?This is an Albert Richard, not a Californian
The cut, the design, the strap, the buckles, the collar…everything really.I was wondering how you determine this was an AR? Can you please share?
I see, I understand you.The cut, the design, the strap, the buckles, the collar…everything really.
This method I have not seen used by AR before.
I must point out this jacket has a particular FRONT POCKETS construction method that I have only observed in CSC.
Perhaps is a Californian made for AR?
I see your point of view. The black jackets you posted were produced by CSC for other companies. The images of the jacket you posted look like CSC because of the construction methods and features such as sleeve and cuff constructions and belt loops, to name a few obvious samples of CSC work. I even question the labels being original to the jacket.This double stitch construction technique on the front pockets is very common for Albert Richard jackets.
View attachment 702974 View attachment 702975
Here’s another
View attachment 702976 View attachment 702977
And another
View attachment 702979 View attachment 702980
Plenty of other makers besides Albert Richard and California Sportswear also used this double stitch construction technique for the front pockets.
Lewis Holster and Leather Goods
View attachment 702981
View attachment 702984
Brooks
View attachment 702987
Many more as well.
Definitely not a California Sportswear. It’s an Albert Richard. Fried Osterman was a big manufacturer.