Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Cuffed or plain? Hemming question.

Kostya

Familiar Face
Messages
56
Location
Texas
First of all, which is preferred for plain-front, cuffed or plain hems? Let's say 1920s-30s. Were both common?

Secondly, when doing plain hems, what should the stitching look like? i.e., how far between the bottom and the stitch?

Pics would help.
 

mannySpaghetti

One of the Regulars
Messages
213
Location
Haverhill, MA
When you say "plain-front", do you mean trousers with no pleats? As far as cuffs go, I'd go with 1" cuffs. Give it some pizazz! If you go with no cuffs, make sure the seamstress leaves some extra leg, just in case you want to put cuffs on later.
 

Max Flash

One of the Regulars
Messages
181
Location
London, UK (and elsewhere...)
If it's pizzazz you want, definitely go with cuffs. On my tailor-made suits, I have 1.5 inch cuffs (or turn-ups as we Brits call them!). The extra details like that, slanted pockets on the jacket and an extra ticket pocket, make it all personal.

I always get flat-fronted trousers on suits. Looks better IMO.
 

Kostya

Familiar Face
Messages
56
Location
Texas
Cuffed or Plain

OK, to clarify, I meant on PLAIN FRONT pants (NO PLEATS), which is more period-correct: CUFFED OR NO CUFFS.

I think for pleated pants, cuffs look better than plain, but for non-pleated pants, I'm not sure.
 

thunderw21

I'll Lock Up
Messages
4,044
Location
Iowa
Creeping Past said:
I've a couple of pairs of flat-fronted high-rise trousers with cuffs/turn-ups. They look good.


Same here.

Plain front can go either way, but pleated trousers should have cuffs.
 

carter

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,921
Location
Corsicana, TX
BINGO

thunderw21 said:
Same here.

Plain front can go either way, but pleated trousers should have cuffs.

Yep. Cuffs for pleats and dress pants. No cuffs for casual flat front, jeans, workwear, etc.
 

Tomasso

Incurably Addicted
Messages
13,719
Location
USA
thunderw21 said:
Plain front can go either way, but pleated trousers should have cuffs.
That's my view as well, though trousers will generally hang better with cuffs, especially those made of lightweight fabrics.

I believe Golden Era cuffs were on the high side, around 2". (Baron!?!?)
 

Rachael

A-List Customer
Messages
465
Location
Stumptown West
or if you want hemmed trousers to hang without a cuff, ask for the hem to be interfaced with horsehair. This will give the same weight and make the hem very crips as well.
 

Lone_Ranger

Practically Family
Messages
500
Location
Central, PA
Not exactly a fashion statement, but related to the Golden Age....

I remember reading a biography of an A-20 Havoc pilot that mentioned hemming a pair of civilian pants. Due to the war time rationing, if he asked the tailor to hem the pants they would keep the "surplus" material. If cuffed, the extra material stayed with the pants.
 

der schneider

One of the Regulars
Messages
113
Location
centralindiana
Yes the war changed the fashions somewhat with rationing. Hem lines went up and cuffs went out for most folks.

1 1/2 - 1 1/4 inch cuffs are standard these days. 1 3/4 was popular in the late 70's and early 80's some ethinic folk still ask for 2 and 3 inch cuffs these days.

On a plain hem 3 inches is good to leave in the hem and if need be, you can make that hem into a 1 1/2 french cuff or if from France you can call it a English cuff or false cuff.

I personaly think french cuffs were the most common type of cuffed hem prior to the felling or blind stitch machine's rise to power.

Today mens fashion is very fortunate. you can wear whatever you like as long as you keep the fashion well balanced and dont mix styles. The proper shoes, belt or suspenders proper tie and shirt combination are mandatory for a good look with the suit style you choose, be it vintage 30's - 80's
 

Forum statistics

Threads
109,144
Messages
3,075,057
Members
54,124
Latest member
usedxPielt
Top