Philip K Nelson said:Your post card is perfect, it shows the from view of the factory on VanZandt street. The other picture you posted is of the rear of the factory, as seen from the New Haven Railway tracks.
Phil
Brad Bowers said:Sadly, this is my only C&K, but at least it's a Derby! Made between 1896 and 1909. I've been trying to get more, but they keep staying just out my reach.lol
Brad
cookie said:Das ist knapp unglaublich Brad!
Dreispitz said:
Do you know anything more about the sweatband arrangement with the lateral bow, as opposesed to the (later?) more common center back ones? Did it serve a particular porpose?
[/QUOTE]
I have no idea why they did it that way.[huh] I've seen one or two other examples like that, and they were as old as this hat, or older, and also Derbies. If it served a particular function, I haven't figured it out. It makes the hat look unbalanced, compared to what we are used to!
Also, if you look closely, you'll see the reed comes together under the sweatband at close to the 11 o'clock position, near the upper right corner of the photo. Strange.
Brad
Brad Bowers said:I have no idea why they did it that way.[huh] I've seen one or two other examples like that, and they were as old as this hat, or older, and also Derbies. If it served a particular function, I haven't figured it out. It makes the hat look unbalanced, compared to what we are used to!
Also, if you look closely, you'll see the reed comes together under the sweatband at close to the 11 o'clock position, near the upper right corner of the photo. Strange.
Brad
Dreispitz said:The reason for the (metal?) reed coming together not right where the sweatband does, might have been done to prevent the the thread scratching the wearer´s head.
Sweatband style:
Is your Derby on the firm side ore more a lightweight town one? My Lock one is really firm and qualyfies for a hunting hat for mounted fun sports of the period. Maybe, it was easier to make the hat fit tighter this way. Well that is only a guess.
Dreispitz said:"][/URL]