I'm asking this as someone who has no idea.
Is completely handmade really always better?
I would say no. Consistent quality has certainly improved with the use of machines. Just think of sewing machines, which ensure consistent thread tension, deliver uniform stitching, etc. Not that an artist can't do that too, but is it better? And I'd rather wait three months for something than 27 months just because it's hand-sewn.
At least for me personally, whether it's handmade or machine-made is only a psychological factor. Of course, the brain plays a role in this, and even if I had two absolutely identical products, one made by hand and one made by machine, I would still value the handmade one more. Completely irrational ;-)
Objectively speaking, it shouldn't make any difference.
The stitchdown podcast discusses this a few times with different makers in a few different episodes and I have many examples of both. There is no notable difference in durability between handwelting or GYW and the only real difference that is noted is that handwelting tends to yield a more flexible sole. I believe you have other people replying in this thread saying the same thing.I can't speak to every indo maker but I know for a fact (and they have a LOT of reels showcasing this on ig) that most of the well known ones exclusively hand stitch the outsoles (briselblack, sagara, fortis, midas/winson, kiattoko, jakkrabbits etc).
Goodyear welting with a canvas rib is objectively mush worst than handwelting.
The canvas rib that the welt is sewn to in goodyear welting is being hold on exclusively by glue and after a while most are separated from the outsole.
I must have gotten confused with clinch, they are really mostly hand made
There is also no benefit to hand sewing outsoles on, which actually yields more inconsistent results than using a landis stitching machine, which is why Clinch and Role Club ( I have asked Brian this in person myself and watched Minoru speak about this in videos) both do not hand sew their outsoles on.


