- Messages
- 16,851
Ken's never been anything but honest, open and friendly with me...
Huge +1
Ken's never been anything but honest, open and friendly with me...
Sandy A had plenty of opportunities to find out what sort of fantasist Will was, given that he was sniffing around Aero in 2011, well before he made his offer in 2012. Also, how stupid must Toohey be, having worked for Aero back in the 90s and then 'off the payroll', more recently, not to have seen what a charlatan Lauder was?
You hit the nail on the head!What's the point if he's not? If he's a tough businessman that demands a lot from his employees? Does that mean he deserves to be stolen from and have a criminal take designs that took years to create and form a competitor?
Enter Perry Mason. This rainy night is going to be swell.
Another AL/SB public relations coup. I've just had a vision: somewhere in Edinburgh as attorney, against his doctor's orders, is washing down two valiums with a glass of single malt and staring off into the middle distance.
Another AL/SB public relations coup. I've just had a vision: somewhere in Edinburgh as attorney, against his doctor's orders, is washing down two valiums with a glass of single malt and staring off into the middle distance.
Another AL/SB public relations coup. I've just had a vision: somewhere in Edinburgh as attorney, against his doctor's orders, is washing down two valiums with a glass of single malt and staring off into the middle distance.
How long do you think the meeting lasted until they came up with "say Ken is not nice"?
So, here's a question;
Does Alexander Leather/Sandy Alexander actually own the Simmons Bilt name? Or are they just using it? I mean, are they just making Simmons Bilt labels to put in their jackets?
Ken Calder owns the rights to the Aero name, which I understand he legally acquired after the original Aero in Beacon NY shut down (hence Aero in Scotland has the right to use original Aero patterns from the war).
But Simmons Bilt, what's the story on that? From Steve Toohey's 'About Us' disaster, it just looks like they spent a really long time on google searching for a defunct vintage brand name to use. Do they actually have legal right to do so? Who did they buy the name from? Who was the owner of that name before it was sold to AL?
Butte, I dunno. Thus far I haven't seen them excel at anything here other than to say the wrong thing at every turn. With months and months to prepare for this possible outcome, it boggles the imagination that they couldn't come up with a better plan for damage control.
I've seen and read enough and feel I'm informed enough to make my feelings known.
1. I own jackets from both companies, but truth be told only one from AL
2. I've received great product from both companies.
3. I have a semi-personal relationship with the Calder's as they've written me off-forum from time to time about jackets and things other than leather.
4. I have no personal relationship with anyone at AL.
Would I buy from AL again? Not right now, not after having read the trial narrative. I have and will continue to buy from Vanson, Aero and others as time, money and interest permit. Sloane has done us all a great service and I thank him and others who've tried to get to the bottom of this whole mess. Having spent a lifetime on the "outside" looking in I've a keen hunger for justice. I feel justice has been done to a degree. I don't know who all knew what, when and what they did in this... however I personally could not in all good conscience voluntarily give honest money to bad people. If that means that innocent staffers at AL suffer... it cannot be helped. As for "putting this all behind us" that's for every individual to decide for themselves. I don't think it'll end as long as AL/SB stays in business as currently constituted there's too much bad blood and ill will on all sides. I'd like folks to agree or politely "agree to disagree" but that's not always gonna happen in real life. So let's do the next best thing we can do.... continue to talk it out as civilly and intelligently as possible.
Worf
Are you kidding me? The Aeromarine is not an original Design by Aero? I have true vintage archives and that design was around far before Aero or Calder ever existed.
You'll have to speak to DP in the only language he understands -- Gaelic.
Another AL/SB public relations coup. I've just had a vision: somewhere in Edinburgh as attorney, against his doctor's orders, is washing down two valiums with a glass of single malt and staring off into the middle distance.
The model may vary in the US, but here in the UK, you have to use a trademark in order to retain its validity. Unregistered marks, you lose the goodwill if someone else takes it up and you've not used it in years; registered marks become invalid if you don't register in good faith and keep it in use. Neither form is time-limited (unlike copyright, or patent), providing the mark is maintained in use. In this sort of vintage lifestyle product market, it's quite common for older marks to be revived. Marks that haven't been used for a long time, which can then be legitimately set up and protected by another party. This is how the Transatlantic Clothing Company were able to acquire the Aero mark; I should think that AL worked on the same basis with Simmonds Bilt.
Yes. Rebranding and launching an entire new line is the best thing to do for them to keep the business going in the long term, but they've gone at it all wrong. It really should have been left on the shelf til they were able to do the whole ting at once, designs and all. They seem to be making some very poor decisions with regards to how to progress the way forward, but then they have form in that regard.
Bravo.
Aero have never claimed otherwise. The overall look of that particular jacket is historical and long out of design protection (that's the nature of vintage reproduction). However, the patterns which Aero have produced to make that jacket in a range of sizes are protected by law. Anyone can come along and copy the jacket, but only by looking at the design and working out their own pattern to create it. Anyone copying Aero's patterns is in breach of the law, and apt to face liability in any action taken against them.
You've misspelled "gibberish". He's certainly fluent in that.
I'm seeing more this:
than this: