- Messages
- 15,563
- Location
- East Central Indiana
Thanks for the well wishes,Allan.
HD
HD
Unless there is already a firefight even cops pull their weapon but hold their fire unless there is no other choice but to use it. They are ready willing and able..but usually only if a warning goes unheeded. Not sure I would agree with a warning shot...but a warning of some kind is indeed most often worth a try. Those who suggest pulling a weapon and immediately firing(in many cases)have either never been in that position of stress or are irresponsible with only throwing around their favorite macho slogan as they accuse others of doing. Pulling a weapon is serious business which can entail grave consequences. Sometimes there is no other way but to use it. Other times it may not be necessary if observant even after you have pointed the gun.
HD
I think you are trying to have the last word as usual. So be it. [huh]
Being willing and able..and doing so..are two different things. You seem to be changing the old saying of 'Don't pull a gun unless you are 'willing'..'ready'..and 'able' to use it'..to..'If you pull your pistol always use it to pump the aggressor full of lead' no matter the circumstances. It's certainly not wise to wave a gun around..but in some scenarios it's mere presence can calm or even stop anymore escalation of the situation real quick...and that may save a real tragedy on either side.
HD
Kansas and Oklahoma must have bizarre laws, then. Brandishing (the action, not the crime) is an acceptable display of force in every jurisdiction that I am familiar with. That is to say, to the extent a justification exists for the use or threat of (deadly) force in self defense or defense of others, openly displaying a firearm is not a felony. Immediate fear of one's life is usually (probably universally, in fact) a justification. As is a reasonable apprehension for one's life (the distinction is subtle, but present), or of serious bodily injury. A majority of states also impute a cognizable threat of death or serious bodily injury from an invasion of an occupied dwelling. Merely waving a firearm around because you happen to have one is, however, generally felonious conduct under statute.Hi
I've taken the Concealed Carry class in both Kansas and Oklahoma. If you pull a gun and don't use it, you are guilty of a felony of brandishing, or assault. You will lose all of your firearms, your right to vote, and spend time in prison. If you feel the need to pull out a gun in those two states, and don't shoot someone, you will be punished. You have to be in fear for your life.
While I don't agree with that concept, that's the law.
As someone who has never held, let alone fired, a live weapon, I feel the need to throw a bit of humour into this debate. I recall reading an account by a South African (or possibly a Rhodesian) soldier in which he fired an entire magazine from a Sterling submachine gun at an attacker. The rounds sprayed everywhere but hit nowhere. After missing with every round he disabled his assailant by hitting him over the head with the weapon. I suppose the message is simple: 45cal or 45mm? Makes no difference if you miss.
A"warning shot", even if using blanks, is an extremely bad idea.
Modern defense ammunition has significantly reduced the difference of terminal performance between 9mm/.38 spl and .45acp.
Carry the weapon with which you are most proficient. Accuracy is paramount, caliber is secondary.
I have been liking 40 cal more and more. Almost as easy to carry as a 9 mm and almost as powerful as a 45 cal.
I would never fire a warning shot as a bullet should be fired being mindful of where the bullet will go if it passes through.