Lean'n'mean
I'll Lock Up
- Messages
- 4,086
- Location
- Cloud-cuckoo-land
and the robot abuse part is strangely disturbing............................."in this world or the next, they will have their revenge."
I love it....and a Lawsuit should follow...and the robot abuse part is strangely disturbing............................."in this world or the next, they will have their revenge."
What gets me is that so many of these videos are not so much parodying the robot as they are parodying the notion of compassion. Who really *is* the soulless empty construct here?
I was thinking more about all the smartass "Robot Lives Matter" memes and comments and such. Ha ha, look, it's snarkier than thou college-boy irony. How witty and original and provocative they think they are. The joke tells more about the one telling it.
Having an emotional response to things that are inanimate is part of the human condition.I guess I'm missing all the psychological aspects. I saw a demonstration of how the robot can react to changes while performing a task and how he/she/it can self-correct in a non-demonstrative environment. IMO, that anyone saw it as "bullying" or that the robot may have an emotional response is more telling about the viewer than any intent on the creator. And I've seen Blade Runner more times than I can count.
Having an emotional response to things that are inanimate is part of the human condition.
How many times here do people feel sad or angry when something historic is destroyed or muddled up- even if we have no true emotional connection to it. I feel bad when historic buildings are razed- even building I have never put a foot in during my life.
I don't think anyone here thinks the robot has feelings. As humans we're conditioned to respond to large host of illogical situations.I understand being emotional about losing a historic building too. But not because I think the building's feelings are hurt.
I just think the point of the video was to demonstrate how the robot corrects itself when the package is knocked away, that it senses it's no longer holding the package and compensates by picking it back up. I don't think that's to inflict psychological damage on either the robot or the observer, it's simply to simulate and test a possible real world condition.
I don't think anyone here thinks the robot has feelings. As humans we're conditioned to respond to large host of illogical situations.
I'd argue feeling bad about a historic building you have zero connection being remuddled is about as logical as feeling bad for a robot getting "pushed around." I also feel bad when I see an old car get chopped up for "art," and that's a machine too.
Several of us have had an emotional reaction (by which I mean any sort of reaction other than "wow, that robot picked up that package! Neat!" reaction). I would hope that the company producing this robot realized that their film, the way it was staged, produced an emotional reaction in a subset of people. And that's poor staging if you want to show off what your neat toy can do. Hence my question of it being a social experiment.
If they're building robots they can't be that dumb, can they?