Uncle Vern
One of the Regulars
- Messages
- 171
Pat H, I've read that book, and it's a good one.
Uncle Vern said:Martinis at 8--The Mexican Revolution did not begin until 1910, and Villa didn't raid Columbus, New Mexico until 1916, so 1902 is an inaccurate date for Mexican border operations.
Pancho Villa wasn't shot in the back by "some guy," he was assassinated while returning to his his ranch in his auto by a group of professional killers who drilled him full of lead from various angles, killing him instantly, probably supporters of Calles. His assassination took place in Parral, Chihuahua. Villa had many enemies. Unless historians discover new information, the actual circumstances of his death will remain a mystery.
For those of you who are interested in Villa, the Mexican Revolution and Villa's Columbus raid, read the recent book "The General and the Jaguar," by Eileen Welsome. While the book deals with Villa's life and many other topics related to the revolution, it specifically addresses the Columbus raid and the intimate recollections of the town's survivors. It's an excellent, well-researched book.
Have at it my friend!Prairie Shade said:Your going to make me post a picture arent you!!!!
Martinis at 8 said:Yes, I know the date. I was referring to the weapon. I should have put an "M" in front of the 1902.
My understanding is he was shot in the back. I must be getting him confused with someone else. But yes, he did have many enemies. What is life without a few good enemies, eh?
M8
Pat_H said:You actually meant M1903, however. The rifle of that era was the M1903. The M1911 was the sidearm, of course, but it was newly introduced, and some National Guard units, and some officers, were still carrying revolvers.